Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026
Real-World M3-BREATHE: Toward Multimodal Mobile Monitoring of Behaviour, Respiration, and Exposures for Treatment and Health Evaluation
Published on: June 5, 2026
Functionality Review of Mobile Apps for the Tracking and Self-Management of Fatigue: Systematic Search in App Stores
Amr Diouf Abdulla1, Corina Sas1, Gavin Doherty2
1School of Computing and Communications, Lancaster University, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4YW, United Kingdom, 44 1524594541.
Background:
Fatigue and chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) have a considerable impact on quality of life, thus motivating people to develop skills for better management of their fatigue. While the number of commercial apps in this domain has increased, there has been limited exploration of their functionalities.
Objective:
This paper aims to address this research gap through a functionality review of 17 top-rated iOS and Android apps for fatigue, with the aim to articulate design implications for technologies focused on supporting the management of fatigue.
Methods:
We conducted a systematic search on the 2 most common app marketplaces, which resulted in the initial identification of 427 Apple apps and 1218 Google apps. From these, 17 apps were selected for review after applying a screening process to shortlist the top-rated apps. The functionalities of these apps were then coded through a week-long usage of each app for an expert evaluation leveraging authors' human-computer interaction (HCI) expertise. We looked for functionalities such as tracking and visualization seen in previous research on functionality reviews, in addition to interventional functionalities, which were informed by research on fatigue.
Results:
Findings reveal the prevalence of functionalities for tracking fatigue (8/17, 47%), related symptoms (8/17, 47%), for visualizing tracked content (10/17, 59%), for assessing the user's condition (2/17, 12%), and for providing interventions for the management of fatigue (12/17, 71%). Functionalities providing interventions for self-management of fatigue are surprisingly limited, with the most relevant ones including pacing (2/17, 12%) alongside energy estimation (2/17, 12%).
Conclusions:
The top-ranked apps for fatigue in the major marketplaces support 3 main functionalities under the scope of tracking fatigue along with related data, and visualizing such data, with limited provision of self-management interventions. Drawing from these findings, we articulate implications for the sensitive design of technologies to support the management of fatigue, including supporting hybrid tracking, combined visualizations to support sense-making of fatigue data with related factors, and supporting energy estimates and pacing interventions.
