Diagnostic performance and inter-observer reproducibility of glomerular PLA2R immunohistochemistry in primary

Birgitte G Tougaard1, Søren Krag2, Eva Gravesen3

  • 1Department of Renal Medicine, Aarhus University Hospital, Palle Juul-Jensens Boulevard 99, Aarhus N, 8200, Denmark. birgod@rm.dk.

BMC Nephrology
|August 12, 2026
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

PLA2R immunohistochemistry (IHC) is crucial for diagnosing PLA2R-associated membranous nephropathy (MN). Validation of IHC protocols and cut-offs is essential for accurate and reproducible results in clinical laboratories.

Area of Science:

  • Nephrology
  • Immunohistochemistry
  • Diagnostic Pathology

Background:

  • Phospholipase A2 receptor (PLA2R) immunohistochemistry (IHC) and serum anti-PLA2R antibodies are vital for diagnosing PLA2R-associated membranous nephropathy (MN).
  • The diagnostic performance and inter-observer reproducibility of PLA2R IHC are not sufficiently validated across diverse laboratory protocols and scoring cut-offs.
  • Methodological considerations, including the interplay between cut-off selection, diagnostic accuracy, and observer reproducibility, require local validation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To locally validate two routine PLA2R IHC protocols for diagnosing PLA2R-associated MN.
  • To assess the impact of different cut-offs on diagnostic accuracy and inter-observer reproducibility.
  • To provide a framework for laboratories implementing PLA2R IHC.

Main Methods:

  • A multi-laboratory study involving kidney biopsies from patients with primary MN, secondary MN, and non-MN controls.
  • Two routine PLA2R IHC protocols (Aarhus University Hospital [AUH] and Herlev Hospital [HEH]) were used.
  • Seven blinded observers scored staining intensity (0-3 scale), with diagnostic performance assessed at a prespecified cut-off (≥2) and optimal cut-offs determined by Youden's J index. Inter-observer agreement was quantified using ICC and the ONEST framework.

Main Results:

  • Diagnostic accuracy varied by protocol and cut-off: sensitivity/specificity ranged from 55%/100% to 70%/70% at the prespecified cut-off, and 65%/93% to 65%/100% at optimal cut-offs.
  • Inter-observer agreement was good-to-excellent overall (ICC=0.85), with higher reliability for the HEH protocol (ICC=0.93) compared to AUH (ICC=0.78).
  • Reproducibility varied between protocols and cut-offs; HEH showed higher agreement (OPA 93%) at the prespecified cut-off, but diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility were not aligned at optimal cut-offs.

Conclusions:

  • PLA2R IHC is clinically useful for diagnosing PLA2R-associated MN, but its performance and reproducibility are protocol-dependent and optimized at different cut-offs.
  • Laboratories must locally validate both diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility dimensions of PLA2R IHC, rather than relying on a single fixed cut-off.
  • A stepwise framework combining Youden's J and ONEST is proposed to guide laboratories in implementing PLA2R IHC.

Related Concept Videos