Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

Foreign Accent and Forensic Speaker Identification in Voice Lineups: The Influence of Acoustic Features Based on Prosody
Published on: September 27, 2024
Gradience in Sonority Sequencing: Evidence From German and Russian
Rowena Garcia1,2,3, Ludger Paschen2,4, Natalie Boll-Avetisyan1
1University of Potsdam, Germany.
None:
This research empirically tests the claim that the sonority sequencing principle (SSP), which dictates that syllables rise in sonority from the edges towards the nucleus, is gradient. This was tested on two languages that vary in their adherence to the SSP, that is, German, which does not allow SSP violations outside of sibilant-initial clusters, and Russian, a language that has more SSP violations. We performed corpus-based lexical statistics to test whether the type frequency (Study 1) and probability of attestedness (Study 2) of word-initial consonant clusters are predicted by sonority difference, that is, the degree by which the consonants in the clusters differed in sonority. In Study 1, we found that in both German and Russian, the higher the sonority difference, the higher the type frequency of a consonant cluster. However, this generalisation only held for non-sibilant-initial clusters. In Study 2, we found that the higher the sonority difference, the higher the probability of a cluster being attested in German and Russian. This finding was also observed for sibilant-initial clusters. Overall, these results provide empirical evidence that the SSP is gradient and can be quantitatively observed even within languages that contain SSP violations. Moreover, our findings highlight the need to consider the special status of sibilant-initial clusters in SSP analyses.

