Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 14, 2026

Performing Data Mining And Integrative Analysis Of Biomarker in Breast Cancer Using Multiple Publicly Accessible Databases
Published on: May 17, 2019
Benchmarking Open-Source Pathology Foundation Models for Breast Cancer Biomarker Prediction from H&E Whole-Slide
Samir Atiya1,2,3, Jiayou Liang4, Kwaku Ofori-Atta4
1Department of Pathology, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
Two AI models, TITAN and CHIEF, show strong performance in predicting estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status from breast cancer whole-slide images. HER2 prediction requires further development before clinical use.
Area of Science:
- Computational pathology
- Artificial intelligence in oncology
- Digital pathology image analysis
Background:
- Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for breast cancer biomarker detection faces challenges like long turnaround times and lab variability.
- Open-source vision-language foundation models offer a potential solution for biomarker inference from H&E-stained whole-slide images (WSIs).
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the performance of two open-source pathology foundation models, TITAN and CHIEF, in predicting ER, PR, and HER2 status from H&E-stained breast cancer WSIs.
- To assess the potential of AI models for biomarker detection in digital pathology.
Main Methods:
- Two models, TITAN (48.5M parameters) and CHIEF (1.2M parameters), were evaluated on H&E-stained breast cancer WSIs from TCGA-BRCA.
- Biomarker status (ER, PR, HER2) was predicted and compared against ground truth labels.
- Performance was assessed using AUROC, AUPRC, sensitivity, specificity, and PPV across 10 independent random partitions.
Main Results:
- Both TITAN and CHIEF demonstrated comparable and strong performance for ER and PR prediction (ER AUROC: 0.877-0.885, PR AUROC: 0.791-0.799).
- HER2 prediction showed moderate performance (AUROC: 0.71-0.74) but very low sensitivity at the default threshold.
- Positive predictive values (PPV) were high for ER (0.90) and moderate for PR (0.79-0.81) at the default operating point.
Conclusions:
- The evaluated AI models show significant potential for ER and PR status prediction in breast cancer digital pathology.
- HER2 prediction requires further optimization, including threshold calibration and multimodal data integration, before clinical application.
- Prospective external validation is crucial before widespread clinical deployment of these AI models.
More Related Videos
07:32Mast Cells in the Microenvironment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Confer Favorable Prognosis: A Retrospective Study using QuPath Image Analysis Software
Published on: April 12, 2024
11:34Building Up a High-throughput Screening Platform to Assess the Heterogeneity of HER2 Gene Amplification in Breast Cancers
Published on: December 5, 2017