Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 15, 2026

Studying Large Amplitude Oscillatory Shear Response of Soft Materials
Published on: April 25, 2019
Fusion dynamics of viscoelastic droplets: Similarities and differences with shape recovery
Mohammad Moein Naderi1, Zhangli Peng2, Huan-Xiang Zhou3
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL 60607, USA.
Abstract:
Biomolecular condensates formed by phase separation inside cells often exhibit viscoelastic behavior, yet their shape recovery and fusion dynamics are frequently interpreted using purely viscous models. Here, we develop a unified theoretical and computational framework to quantify how viscoelasticity governs these two fundamental processes. We combine analytical theory for small-deformation shape recovery with axisymmetric finite-element simulations based on the Oldroyd-B constitutive model to systematically investigate both shape recovery and droplet fusion under comparable physical conditions. Our results show that, although both processes are driven by capillary forces, they are distinct in their underlying physics. Shape recovery is governed by global viscocapillary relaxation of a single connected interface and follows single- or multi-exponential decay depending on the relative magnitude of the viscocapillary timescale and the stress relaxation time. In contrast, droplet fusion is intrinsically a multi-stage process involving localized curvature-driven neck formation, rapid bridge expansion, and a transition to global relaxation. We demonstrate that viscoelasticity introduces an additional intrinsic timescale that governs the competition between capillary driving and stress relaxation, characterized by the Deborah number. This leads to enhanced intermediate-stage fusion dynamics and modified relaxation behavior compared to Newtonian droplets. Furthermore, we show that the presence of an exterior fluid with finite viscosity introduces additional hydrodynamic dissipation through two-phase coupling, significantly slowing the fusion process. Finally, we compare the computationally predicted droplet fusion in the Newtonian and viscoelastic cases with a stretched-exponential empirical formula. Deviations observed in viscoelastic regimes highlight the limitations of purely viscous descriptions and the need for models incorporating stress relaxation and memory effects.
Related Concept Videos
Characteristics of Fluids
Characteristics of Fluids
Fluids, which include both liquids and gases, are substances that deform continuously under shearing stress. For example, water and oil are liquids with molecules that can...
Viscosity of Fluid
Phase Transitions: Vaporization and Condensation
Surface Tension, Capillary Action, and Viscosity
The various IMFs between identical molecules of a substance are examples of cohesive forces. The molecules within a liquid are surrounded by other molecules and are attracted equally in all directions by the cohesive forces within the liquid. However, the molecules on the surface of a liquid are attracted only by about one-half as many molecules. Because of the unbalanced molecular attractions on the surface molecules, liquids contract to form a shape that minimizes the number...
Viscosity
The SI unit of viscosity is...

