Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 16, 2026

08:57
Identifying, Diagnosing, and Grading Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors in Genetically Engineered Mouse Models
Published on: May 17, 2024
Cervical Myofibroblastoma: Expanding the Differential for Cervical Masses
Alexandra Hamilton1, Judy Hayek2, Phyllis Lawani1
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, NewYork-Presbyterian (NYP) Brooklyn Methodist Hospital, Brooklyn, New York, USA.
Case Reports in Obstetrics and Gynecology
|August 15, 2026
Summary
Lower genital tract myofibroblastoma is a rare gynecologic tumor. This report details a unique case of cervical myofibroblastoma in a 32-year-old female, adding to limited existing literature.
Area of Science:
- Gynecologic Oncology
- Pathology
- Oncology
Background:
- Lower genital tract myofibroblastomas are exceptionally rare gynecologic neoplasms.
- Published literature primarily comprises case reports, highlighting diagnostic challenges and rarity.
- Differential diagnoses include cervical leiomyomas, nabothian cysts, and angiomyofibroblastomas.
Purpose of the Study:
- To report a rare case of cervical myofibroblastoma in a 32-year-old female.
- To contribute to the limited body of literature on this rare gynecologic tumor.
- To review and compare with previously reported cases of cervical myofibroblastoma.
Main Methods:
- Surgical excision of a large cervical lesion.
- Histopathological examination of the excised tissue.
- Comprehensive literature review of cervical myofibroblastoma cases since 2017.
Main Results:
- A 32-year-old female presented with and was diagnosed with cervical myofibroblastoma post-excision.
- This represents the sixth reported case of cervical myofibroblastoma since 2017.
- The case adds to the understanding of the clinical presentation and pathology of this rare tumor.
Conclusions:
- Cervical myofibroblastoma is a rare entity requiring careful differential diagnosis.
- Further research is needed to elucidate the pathogenesis, potentially involving hormonal or infectious factors.
- This case underscores the importance of reporting rare gynecologic neoplasms to expand medical knowledge.