Related Experiment Videos
Liposomal bupivacaine surgical site injection for decrease of narcotic use in hip fractures: a pilot multicenter
Paul Edward Matuszewski1, Jacob Jo2, Arun Aneja1
1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY.
Objectives:
To conduct a pilot randomized control trial evaluating the effectiveness of liposomal bupivacaine to potentially inform a larger trial for effect size and feasibility.
Design:
Double-Blinded Multicenter Randomized Control Trial.
Setting:
Level I trauma centers.
Patients/Participants:
Patients older than 55 years with isolated fragility hip fractures undergoing surgery.
Intervention:
Liposomal bupivacaine (TX) or placebo injection of saline (P).
Main Outcome Measurements:
Morphine milliequivalents at 24, 48, and 72 hours postoperatively. Visual analog scale pain scores, Confusion Assessment Method scores, delirium episodes, and surgical/medical complications were all used as secondary outcomes.
Results:
There were no statistically significant differences in the primary or secondary outcome measures at any time points. Seventy-two-hour opiate use was P: 65.4 mg (95% confidence interval 45.7-85.1) vs TX: 52.5 mg (30.2-74.7), P = 0.37. There was no significant difference in opiate use and visual analog scale scores any time point. There was no difference in Confusion Assessment Method scores or episodes of confusion/delirium nor surgical or medical complications. A 72-hour time point for data collection was not feasible, whereas 48 hours was, with 89% of data points collected. The sample size required for a superiority trial to detect a 20% difference in opioid use would require 518 patients.
Conclusions:
We were unable to demonstrate a clinical difference between liposomal bupivacaine and placebo in narcotic use, pain scores, or postoperative delirium in geriatric fragility fractures. It is possible that there may be a small effect size that we were unable to detect, and a larger study may demonstrate that. However, given the unlikely large improvement in pain, expense of the medication, and technique dependent nature, a smaller difference does not warrant a larger trial nor uniform administration.
Level Of Evidence:
Level 1.
Clinical Trial Registration Number:
NCT03289858.
Related Concept Videos
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Spinal Anesthesia
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Epidural Anesthesia
Since epidural anesthetics can be infused through an epidural catheter, all types of drugs, including short-acting ones, can be administered. Chloroprocaine and lidocaine are examples of short and long-duration anesthetics, respectively. Bupivacaine...
Local Anesthetics: Common Agents and Their Applications
Cocaine is an ester of benzoic acid and methylecgogine. It is used to anesthetize and vasoconstrict locally. Currently, it is used primarily for topical applications. It is beneficial for surgeries on the upper respiratory tract, providing anesthesia and shrinking the mucosa. Cocaine in the form of cocaine hydrochloride is...
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Surface, Infiltration, and Conduction Block Anesthesia
Local Anesthetics: Pharmacokinetics