Related Experiment Videos
Nutritional risk management for stroke survivors with dysphagia in a rehabilitation department: a best practice
Qiuxiang Mi1, Dandan Qu1, Li Wang2
1Changsha Central Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, China.
Introduction:
Stroke survivors with dysphagia face a greater risk of malnutrition and life-threatening complications, yet evidence-based nutritional management in this population remains underutilized in clinical practice.
Objective:
This project aimed to implement and evaluate an evidence-based standardized nutritional risk management program for stroke survivors with dysphagia in a rehabilitation department in a hospital in China.
Methods:
This evidence implementation project was conducted using the JBI Evidence Implementation Framework, which is grounded in an audit and feedback process, along with a structured approach to identifying barriers to best practice recommendations. The audits included 28 health care professionals. Patient participation was 41 at baseline, 45 at first follow-up, and 46 at second follow-up. Compliance with 27 evidence-based audit criteria was evaluated, and four key barriers were identified, with corresponding change strategies implemented to address them. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, ANOVA, and χ2 tests.
Results:
The majority of audit criteria showed significant improvement in compliance: 13 reached 100%, while the remaining 14 achieved a compliance rate exceeding 84%. Health care professionals' knowledge scores of nutritional management demonstrated a significant increase across the three audit cycles, rising from 12.21 ± 3.201 at baseline to 19.18 ± 2.611 in the second follow-up audit ( F = 48.102, p < 0.001). Similarly, patients'/caregivers' knowledge scores increased significantly from 9.00 ± 2.674 to 16.48 ± 2.987 ( F = 78.835, p < 0.001). Analysis across all audits revealed a significant reduction in both the incidence of hypoalbuminemia (from 17.1% to 2.2%; p = 0.048, Fisher's exact test) and complication rates (from 48.8% to 10.9%; χ2 = 17.476, p < 0.001).
Conclusions:
The project successfully integrated evidence-based nutritional risk management into clinical practice, demonstrating that multidisciplinary team collaboration, systematic training, and protocol standardization can significantly enhance evidence-based practice and may improve patient outcomes. To ensure sustainability, ongoing education, regular audits, and expansion to other clinical units are recommended.
Spanish Abstract:
https://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A676.
Related Concept Videos
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube through...
Enteral Nutrition I: Orogastric and Nasogastric Feeding
Orogastric (OG) and nasogastric (NG) feeding are two standard methods used for enteral nutrition. Enteral nutrition is often preferred over...
Atherosclerosis IV: Nursing Management