Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 21, 2026

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
ALNCR.TNM as a Novel Prognostic Tool for Cancer Survival
Heyang Zhang1,2,3, Guotian Ruan2,3,4, Zelin Chai5
1Department of Gastroenterology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases, Beijing Digestive Disease Center, Beijing Key Laboratory for Precancerous Lesion of Digestive Diseases, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Background:
Systemic inflammation is associated with cancer prognosis, but commonly used inflammatory indices show limited discrimination across heterogeneous malignancies. We developed and validated a novel inflammatory burden index, ALNCR, and tested whether integrating ALNCR with TNM stage improves overall survival (OS) prediction.
Methods:
We analysed 6374 adults with cancer from the multicentre INSCOC cohort (2013-2021), randomly split into a training cohort (n = 4464) and internal validation cohort (n = 1910), and an external validation cohort from Fujian Cancer Hospital (n = 759). Female proportions were 39.0%, 41.2% and 32.0%, and median ages were 60, 60 and 58 years, respectively; Stage IV disease accounted for 45.4%, 45.8% and 64.8%. ALNCR was defined as (albumin × lymphocyte) / (neutrophil × C-reactive protein). Discrimination was assessed using C-index and time-dependent AUC, with comparisons to NLR, PLR, CAR, SII and PNI. A combined model (ALNCR.TNM) used ALNCR (cutoff 3.21) and TNM stage (I/II vs. III/IV); incremental value was quantified by net reclassification improvement (NRI) and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI).
Results:
ALNCR showed the highest discrimination for OS among evaluated indices (C-index 0.645 [95% CI 0.631-0.658] in training; 0.666 [0.645-0.686] in internal validation; and 0.657 [0.624-0.690] in external validation). High ALNCR (≥ 3.21) was associated with longer OS than low ALNCR (median OS not reached vs. 22.3 months; log-rank p < 0.001). After multivariable adjustment, high ALNCR remained associated with lower mortality (HR 0.56 [0.51-0.61], 0.50 [0.43-0.58] and 0.53 [0.42-0.67] across the three cohorts; all p < 0.001). Adding ALNCR to TNM improved prediction over TNM alone (ΔC-index +0.021; NRI 0.067, p = 0.010; IDI 0.004, p < 0.001) and stratified patients into four risk groups (p < 0.0001), with consistent associations across major cancer types and clinical strata.
Conclusions:
ALNCR is a simple inflammation-based prognostic index that outperforms conventional inflammatory markers for OS prediction. Integrating ALNCR with TNM stage improves risk stratification and prognostic accuracy, supporting clinical implementation via a nomogram and web-based calculator.
Related Concept Videos
lncRNA - Long Non-coding RNAs
Cancer Survival Analysis