Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 21, 2026

Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration in Patients with a Previous History of Biliary Tract Surgery
Published on: February 10, 2023
[Comparison of 6-Year Outcomes after Open Surgery, Successful Laparoscopic Adhesiolysis, and Non-Operative Management
A E Tyagunov1,2, B M Abdulkarim1,2, O N Mironenko3
1Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
Objective:
To compare short- and long-term outcomes of open surgery, laparoscopic adhesiolysis and non-operative management in patients with adhesive small bowel obstruction.
Material And Methods:
A multiple-center retrospective cohort study included 366 patients with small bowel obstruction (SBO) treated across seven hospitals in Moscow. All patients were hospitalized between 01/01/2017 and 12/31/2019. Primary endpoints were overall survival and mean life expectancy (MLE) over 6 years after initial hospitalization, cumulative probability of rehospitalization and surgery at rehospitalization, mean duration of index hospitalization, mean duration of a single hospitalization and overall hospital-stay per a patient over 6 years. Statistical analysis included Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Aalen-Johansen estimator, Markov modeling, Cox proportional hazards regression, log-rank test, Gray's test, Fisher's exact test, and Welch's t-test.
Results:
At index hospitalization, non-operative management (NOM) was successful in 228 patients (62%). Open surgery (OS) was performed in 87 patients (24%) and laparoscopic adhesiolysis (LA) in 51 patients (14%). Over subsequent 6-year follow-up, 94 (26%) patients died, and 67 (19%) patients were re-hospitalized with recurrent small bowel obstruction. Of these, 17 (5%) ones underwent surgery. Over 6 years, MLE did not differ significantly between the LA and NOM groups. However, it was significantly longer compared with the OS group (by 12.7 months (95% CI: 4.2-21.2; p<0.001) and 13.8 months (95% CI: 3.7-23.8; p=0.003), respectively). The risk of SBO recurrence (rehospitalization) after NOM was higher by 5.26 times (95% CI: 1.54-16.7; p=0.004) and after OS by 3.76 times (95% CI: 1.01-13.97; p=0.046) compared to LA. Mean total hospital-stay over 6 years was significantly shorter after LA and NOM compared to OS (by 6.2 days (95% CI: 1.1-8.9; p=0.011) and 6.1 days (95% CI: 1.8-8.0; p=0.002), respectively). Cumulative probability of surgery at rehospitalization did not differ significantly (p=0.229).
Conclusion:
Six-year survival of patients with SBO was better after NOM and LA compared to OS. Recurrence of SBO was more common after NOM and OS.
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
