Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 21, 2026

Bone Marrow Transplantation Procedures in Mice to Study Clonal Hematopoiesis
Published on: May 26, 2021
High Predicted Thiotepa Exposure is Associated with Increased Risk of Thrombotic Microangiopathy and Non-Relapse
Christopher C Dvorak1, Willem Collier2, Soohee Cho3
1Division of Pediatric Allergy, Immunology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Thiotepa is commonly included in combination with other agents to prevent rejection and relapse following alpha-beta-T-cell/CD19-depleted (AB-TCD) haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for pediatric patients with hematologic malignancies. A standard regimen of 5 mg/kg for two doses was developed in adults and has been extrapolated to the pediatric population. We hypothesized that outlier (low or high) thiotepa exposures would be associated with inferior event-free- (EFS) and overall- (OS) survival due to increased rejection and non-relapse mortality (NRM) in pediatric patients undergoing AB-TCD haploidentical HCT. We also hypothesized that there would be an increased incidence of transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA) in patients with high thiotepa exposure. Utilizing a validated pharmacokinetic (PK) model, we retrospectively predicted total exposure of thiotepa and its active metabolite TEPA combined as a cumulative area under the curve (cAUCtotal) in 203 patients with hematologic malignancy undergoing AB-TCD haploidentical HCT at nine centers on two prospective trials between 2015 and 2025. No actual PK samples were available. The median thiotepa dose was 5.0 mg/kg (range, 3.4 to 5.3) administered in two doses 12 h apart, resulting in a median predicted cAUCtotal of 50.3 mg·h/L (range, 36.8 to 64.7). We first modeled time-to-event (rejection, relapse, or death) as a function of thiotepa cAUCtotal using fitted "b-splines" under Cox regression, with complexity limited to control over-fitting. We identified the cAUCtotal level that maximized the 3-yr EFS probability as approximately 45 mg·h/L (95% confidence interval [CI], 43 to 52). We next established conservative cut-points to identify an optimal range of exposure to account for residual variability in the PK model, classifying patients as having low (<42 mg·h/L; n = 21), medium (42 to 50 mg·h/L; n = 78), or high (>50 mg·h/L; n = 104) exposure. Low thiotepa exposure was significantly associated with a higher 1-yr cumulative incidence of rejection (23.8% versus 4.5% for ≥42 mg·h/L; P < .001), and high thiotepa exposure was significantly associated with a higher 3-yr NRM (20% versus 6.8% for <50 mg·h/L; P = .007). Furthermore, a thiotepa cAUCtotal of ≥53 mg·h/L was associated with development of TA-TMA; the 1-yr cumulative incidence was significantly higher in those with thiotepa exposure ≥53 mg·h/L (25.6% versus 7.5% for <53 mg·h/L; P < .001). No statistically significant associations were found between thiotepa exposure and Day 100 sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (P = .337), 3-yr relapse (P = .449), or 3-yr EFS (P = .212). However, 3-yr OS was significantly lower in those with high thiotepa exposure (68.9% versus 85.8% for <50 mg·h/L; P = .007). We then sought to evaluate whether key thiotepa exposure-outcome associations were explained by potential confounders (patient/donor age, antithymocyte globulin exposure, etc.). To contrast outcomes across groups defined by high relative to medium/low exposure, propensity scores (PSs) were used to re-weight the dataset to balance confounders across groups. The PS-weighted hazard ratio (HR) for NRM was 3.19 (high relative to medium/low exposure; 95% CI, 1.14 to 19.89). The data did not support PS reweighting to contrast low relative to medium/high thiotepa exposure, and we instead used adjusted Cox regression. The adjusted HR for rejection was 6.81 (low relative to medium/high exposure; 95% CI, 1.55 to 29.83). The associations between thiotepa exposure and key outcomes such as NRM and rejection did not appear to be explained by measured confounders. For pediatric patients undergoing AB-TCD haploidentical HCT for treatment of hematologic malignancies, we found predicted cAUCtotal of thiotepa was associated with increased risk of rejection (low exposure), TA-TMA and NRM (high exposure), as well as overall mortality (high exposure). The identified optimal cAUCtotal of 45 mg·h/L was well below the median of 50.3, suggesting that the conventional regimen of 5 mg/kg × 2 doses may be supra-therapeutic for many patients. Model-based dosing of thiotepa to achieve optimal exposure may lower toxicity and improve outcomes and should be tested in prospective trials.
Thiotepa is commonly included in combination with other agents to prevent rejection and relapse following alpha-beta-T-cell/CD19-depleted (AB-TCD) haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) for pediatric patients with hematologic malignancies. A standard regimen of 5 mg/kg for two doses was developed in adults and has been extrapolated to the pediatric population. We hypothesized that outlier (low or high) thiotepa exposures would be associated with inferior event-free- (EFS) and overall- (OS) survival due to increased rejection and non-relapse mortality (NRM) in pediatric patients undergoing AB-TCD haploidentical HCT. We also hypothesized that there would be an increased incidence of transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA) in patients with high thiotepa exposure. Utilizing a validated pharmacokinetic (PK) model, we retrospectively predicted total exposure of thiotepa and its active metabolite TEPA combined as a cumulative area under the curve (cAUCtotal) in 203 patients with hematologic malignancy undergoing AB-TCD haploidentical HCT at nine centers on two prospective trials between 2015 and 2025. No actual PK samples were available. The median thiotepa dose was 5.0 mg/kg (range, 3.4 to 5.3) administered in two doses 12 h apart, resulting in a median predicted cAUCtotal of 50.3 mg·h/L (range, 36.8 to 64.7). We first modeled time-to-event (rejection, relapse, or death) as a function of thiotepa cAUCtotal using fitted "b-splines" under Cox regression, with complexity limited to control over-fitting. We identified the cAUCtotal level that maximized the 3-yr EFS probability as approximately 45 mg·h/L (95% confidence interval [CI], 43 to 52). We next established conservative cut-points to identify an optimal range of exposure to account for residual variability in the PK model, classifying patients as having low (<42 mg·h/L; n = 21), medium (42 to 50 mg·h/L; n = 78), or high (>50 mg·h/L; n = 104) exposure. Low thiotepa exposure was significantly associated with a higher 1-yr cumulative incidence of rejection (23.8% versus 4.5% for ≥42 mg·h/L; P < .001), and high thiotepa exposure was significantly associated with a higher 3-yr NRM (20% versus 6.8% for <50 mg·h/L; P = .007). Furthermore, a thiotepa cAUCtotal of ≥53 mg·h/L was associated with development of TA-TMA; the 1-yr cumulative incidence was significantly higher in those with thiotepa exposure ≥53 mg·h/L (25.6% versus 7.5% for <53 mg·h/L; P < .001). No statistically significant associations were found between thiotepa exposure and Day 100 sinusoidal obstruction syndrome (P = .337), 3-yr relapse (P = .449), or 3-yr EFS (P = .212). However, 3-yr OS was significantly lower in those with high thiotepa exposure (68.9% versus 85.8% for <50 mg·h/L; P = .007). We then sought to evaluate whether key thiotepa exposure-outcome associations were explained by potential confounders (patient/donor age, antithymocyte globulin exposure, etc.). To contrast outcomes across groups defined by high relative to medium/low exposure, propensity scores (PSs) were used to re-weight the dataset to balance confounders across groups. The PS-weighted hazard ratio (HR) for NRM was 3.19 (high relative to medium/low exposure; 95% CI, 1.14 to 19.89). The data did not support PS reweighting to contrast low relative to medium/high thiotepa exposure, and we instead used adjusted Cox regression. The adjusted HR for rejection was 6.81 (low relative to medium/high exposure; 95% CI, 1.55 to 29.83). The associations between thiotepa exposure and key outcomes such as NRM and rejection did not appear to be explained by measured confounders. For pediatric patients undergoing AB-TCD haploidentical HCT for treatment of hematologic malignancies, we found predicted cAUCtotal of thiotepa was associated with increased risk of rejection (low exposure), TA-TMA and NRM (high exposure), as well as overall mortality (high exposure). The identified optimal cAUCtotal of 45 mg·h/L was well below the median of 50.3, suggesting that the conventional regimen of 5 mg/kg × 2 doses may be supra-therapeutic for many patients. Model-based dosing of thiotepa to achieve optimal exposure may lower toxicity and improve outcomes and should be tested in prospective trials.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacogenetics of Drug Targets: β₂-Adrenergic Receptors, Apo E, Thymidylate Synthase
Bone Marrow Sampling and Transplants
The transplant begins with high doses of chemotherapy and radiation treatment, which aim to destroy the...
