Clinicopathological Concordance in Panniculitis: A Prospective Study of 48 Cases

Piyush Yadav1, Prashant Durgapal2, Naveen Kumar Kansal1

  • 1Department of Dermatology, Venereology, and Leprosy, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, India.

Abstract

Insights

Accurate panniculitis diagnosis requires integrating clinical and histopathological findings. This study found only 69% concordance, highlighting the need for combined approaches to improve patient outcomes and avoid misdiagnosis.

Area of Science:

  • Dermatology
  • Pathology

Background:

  • Retrospective studies show variable clinicopathologic concordance in panniculitis.
  • Lack of prospective data on clinical vs. histopathological diagnosis concordance.
  • Potential for misdiagnosis, delayed treatment, and poor outcomes in panniculitis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the concordance between clinical and histopathological diagnoses in suspected panniculitis cases.
  • To evaluate the accuracy of clinical assessment against histopathological findings in panniculitis.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective, cross-sectional study at a tertiary-care center in North India.
  • Deep skin biopsy and histopathological evaluation for panniculitis features (septal/lobular, vasculitis, infiltrates, fat necrosis).
  • Clinical data collection and diagnosis recording.

Main Results:

  • Erythema nodosum leprosum (ENL) was the most common clinical diagnosis (71%).
  • Predominantly lobular panniculitis was the most common histopathological finding (73%).
  • Overall concordance between clinical and histopathological diagnoses was 69%.

Conclusions:

  • Highlights the importance of integrating both clinical and histopathological data for accurate panniculitis diagnosis.
  • Sole reliance on either clinical or histopathological data may lead to diagnostic inaccuracies.
  • Combined diagnostic approach is crucial for optimal patient management in panniculitis.