Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 25, 2026
![Quantitative [18F]-Naf-PET-MRI Analysis for the Evaluation of Dynamic Bone Turnover in a Patient with Facetogenic Low Back Pain](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcloudfront.jove.com%2FCDNSource%2Fteasers%2F58491.jpg&w=3840&q=50)
Quantitative [18F]-Naf-PET-MRI Analysis for the Evaluation of Dynamic Bone Turnover in a Patient with Facetogenic Low Back Pain
Published on: August 8, 2019
Fusion of photon-counting CT and MRI improves assessment of the knee: a pilot study
Zhaoye Zhou1, Theresa Sophie Patzer2, Mohamad Alzaher3
1Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States; Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.
Purpose:
The complementary information gained by combining photon counting CT (PCCT) and MRI may enhance the evaluation of the osteochondral unit. Our aim is to evaluate whether fusing PCCT and MRI improves diagnostic clarity and segmentation consistency for osteochondral lesions compared with MRI alone.
Materials And Methods:
24 participants (15 with knee OA and 9 healthy controls) underwent PCCT and 3T MRI between October 2024 and May 2025. Images were co-registered and fused using a mutual information-based algorithm. Two musculoskeletal radiologists rated diagnostic clarity on 5-point Likert scales. Inter-reader agreement was quantified with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Cohen kappa. Another musculoskeletal radiologist and a radiology trainee performed manual segmentations of bones, cartilage, meniscus, and osteophytes on PCCT-MRI fusion or MRI alone. Inter- and intra-rater segmentation consistency was evaluated using Dice similarity coefficient and surface Dice (sDice). Paired comparisons were analyzed with the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
Results:
Fusion imaging yielded significantly higher clarity scores for cartilage thickness (3.91 vs 4.95), articular surface (3.93 vs 4.63), and osteophyte boundaries (4.00 vs 4.83; all p < .05). Inter-reader agreement improved (ICC, from 0.43 to 0.88; Cohen kappa, from 0.42 to 0.89). Quantitative analysis showed greater inter- and intra-rater consistency for cartilage (Dice, 0.70 vs 0.81; sDice, 0.66 vs 0.78) and bone (Dice, 0.93 vs 0.95; sDice, 0.61 vs 0.86; all p < .01).
Conclusion:
PCCT-MRI fusion enhances diagnostic clarity and inter-reader agreement. Fusion also increases segmentation consistency for cartilage and bone, supporting its potential clinical value for comprehensive osteochondral evaluation.
More Related Videos
18:40Combined In vivo Optical and µCT Imaging to Monitor Infection, Inflammation, and Bone Anatomy in an Orthopaedic Implant Infection in Mice
Published on: October 16, 2014
07:43In Vivo Quantification of Hip Arthrokinematics during Dynamic Weight-bearing Activities using Dual Fluoroscopy
Published on: July 2, 2021