Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 26, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
What works, for whom, and under what circumstances for recipients of training in opportunistic behaviour change
Beth Nichol1,2, Angela M Rodrigues3, Robert Anderson-Weaver4
1School of Communities and Education, Northumbria University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Background:
Making Every Contact Count' (MECC) is a person-centred initiative that enables service providers across settings to support behaviour change through conversations about health and wellbeing. MECC has been widely implemented across the UK and internationally, although training approaches vary considerably and do not consistently translate into MECC delivery. Evidence suggests that Healthy Conversation Skills (HCS) training, which supports service users to identify their own solutions, may be an acceptable and effective means of delivering MECC across settings. This realist evaluation aims to understand which elements of HCS training work, for whom, under what circumstances, in what respects, to what extent, and why, to inform the adaptation of HCS across settings to ensure that all recipients are equipped to deliver MECC.
Methods:
This mixed-methods realist evaluation will comprise pre- and post-training surveys (at baseline, immediately post-training, and approximately eight weeks post-training) and realist interviews. Two participant groups were selected for comparison: service providers working or volunteering in the voluntary, community, and social enterprise (VCSE) sector, and undergraduate pharmacy students. Initial programme theories were developed through abductive reasoning, literature scoping, and stakeholder engagement. Survey data will assess outcomes of HCS training, while realist interviews will explore how these outcomes are generated by underlying mechanisms within specific contexts.
Discussion:
A refined programme theory will be produced, explaining how and why HCS training leads to MECC delivery across different settings. Findings will inform how HCS training can be adapted for distinct audiences, identify the core components of MECC training that must be preserved, and guide future evaluations by examining whether HCS training translates into sustained MECC delivery. The findings of this study will inform resource allocation for preventative health interventions outside of healthcare settings and thus have the potential to shape public health policy, empower non-specialist providers, and strengthen strategies for disease prevention.
Related Concept Videos
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Operant Conditioning Intervention
In operant conditioning, behaviors that are...
Behavior Modification
A real-world application of operant conditioning principles is applied...
Modeling in Therapy
Participant Modeling
Participant modeling involves therapists demonstrating calm and effective behaviors in situations...
The Scientific Method
Observational Studies
There are three types of observational studies – Prospective, retrospective, and cross-sectional.
Prospective Study
Prospective studies, also known as longitudinal or cohort studies, are carried out by collecting future data from groups sharing similar characteristics. One example of...