Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 28, 2026

Immunophenotyping of Orthotopic Homograft (Syngeneic) of Murine Primary KPC Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma by Flow Cytometry
Published on: October 9, 2018
Identification of PD-1-Related Genes as Prognostic Biomarkers in Lung Adenocarcinoma
Bin Jia1, Ting Gong2, Chen Chen1
1Lung Cancer Department, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin, China, tmucih.com.
Background:
The PD-1/PD-L1 axis plays a critical role in suppressing T-cell activation and facilitating immune evasion in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). This study focused on PD-1-related genes to develop a robust prognostic prediction model for LUAD.
Methods:
Immune scores were calculated using the ESTIMATE algorithm, and immune-related gene modules were identified through WGCNA. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified between normal and tumor tissues, and between high and low PD-1 expression groups, using the limma package. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to construct a prognostic risk model, which was subsequently evaluated using time-dependent ROC curve analysis with the timeROC package. Biomarker expression and function were validated in LUAD cells via western blot (WB), CCK-8, wound healing, and Transwell assays. Functional enrichment analysis was conducted using the clusterProfiler package. The tumor microenvironment (TME) was characterized by integrating MCPcounter, ESTIMATE, and ssGSEA. Drug sensitivity was predicted using the pRRophetic R package.
Results:
WGCNA showed that genes in the brown module were significantly positively correlated with the immune score, and these genes were predominantly enriched in biological processes such as neutrophil activation and cytokine activity. By intersecting the brown module genes, DEGs, and PD-1-related genes, we constructed a risk prognosis model comprising nine key genes (ADA2, CD53, HLA-DMA, ITGAX, MYO1F, NCKAP1L, PTPRC, RENBP, and TNFAIP8L2). The model demonstrated robust predictive performance, with high AUC values in time-dependent ROC analysis. Patients within the high-risk group exhibited a worse prognosis. Additionally, RiskScore for patients in the high-risk group was closely associated with immune infiltration, immune checkpoint expression, and drug sensitivity. The low-risk group exhibited higher levels of immune cell infiltration, including T cells, CD8+ T cells, and B lineage cells. Furthermore, in vitro experiments have demonstrated that silencing the representative gene MYO1F significantly inhibited the migration and invasion of LUAD cells, whereas PTPRC knockdown promoted these capacities. Drug sensitivity analysis identified distinct candidate therapeutic agents for the high- and low-risk groups.
Conclusion:
In conclusion, this study developed a robust prognostic prediction model for LUAD, contributing to personalized therapeutic strategies.

