Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 29, 2026

A Unified Methodological Framework for Vestibular Schwannoma Research
Published on: June 20, 2017
Asymmetric Hearing Loss as a Population Screening Signal for Vestibular Schwannoma: A Number-Needed-To-Scan Analysis
Hui Zhang1, Chengdong Sun2, Shuping Gao3
1Department of Neurosurgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, P.R. China.
Objective:
Asymmetric sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) is the principal audiometric trigger for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to exclude vestibular schwannoma (VS). Although multiple audiometric referral criteria exist, the population-level burden of applying them has not been quantified. To estimate how many adults in the general United States population would be flagged for MRI by each of the 5 recognized audiometric referral criteria per incident VS, and to place that burden in the context of established screening programs and of current clinically indicated imaging.
Methods:
We pooled adult audiometry from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES; 1999-2000 through 2017-March 2020; n = 14,293) and estimated the survey-weighted prevalence of 5 recognized MRI-referral criteria for asymmetric SNHL by age and sex. Age-specific VS incidence was obtained from a VS-specific Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) extraction (site C72.4, histology ICD-O-3 9560, benign behavior; 12 registries, 2004-2022; n = 12,958). We calculated a Number-Needed-to-Scan (NNScan), defined as the number of adults flagged per incident VS per year.
Results:
Age-adjusted VS incidence ranged from 1.4 to 1.8 per 100,000 person-years (median 1.7; crude 1.8). The prevalence of a referral-positive audiogram increased with age (American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery [AAO-HNS] criterion, 2.2% at ages 20-29 vs. 8.9% at ages 60-69) and was consistently higher in men than women (6.2% vs. 3.9%; P < 0.001). NNScan was lowest among adults aged 70-79 years (≈1260 per incident VS with the AAO-HNS criterion) and ranged up to ≈54,200 in younger adults and with more sensitive criteria. For comparison, published diagnostic yields of MRI in symptomatic, clinically referred patients (1.6%-3.7%) correspond to ≈27-64 scans per VS, a 20-fold to 47-fold difference.
Conclusions:
Audiometric asymmetry is far more common than VS, so testing unselected adults in order to select candidates for MRI is an inefficient use of imaging resources: even in the most favorable age group and with the most specific criterion, approximately 1260 MRI examinations would be required per incident tumor. These findings argue against population-level audiometric screening for VS, but they do not diminish the value of the same criteria in symptomatic, clinically selected patients, in whom the pre-test probability is one to 2 orders of magnitude higher.