Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 29, 2026

Preparation of Stable Bicyclic Aziridinium Ions and Their Ring-Opening for the Synthesis of Azaheterocycles
Published on: August 22, 2018
To Thread or not to Thread: Reaction of Uranyl (UO2 2+) with two Aza-crown Macrocycles
Gabriella S Godinho1, Kevin K Lee1, Qien Feng1
1Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, United States.
Abstract:
The complexation of the uranyl ion (UO2 2+) by macrocyclic ligands is hindered by the rigidly enforced trans orientation of its oxo ligands. To further investigate this coordination chemistry challenge, here we investigate the reactivity of UO2 2+ with two different 18-membered aza-crown macrocycles, diaza-dibenzo-18-crown-6 (DADBC) and 7,16-bis(N-methylacetamide)diaza-18-crown-6 (BAM). The reaction of uranyl triflate, [UO2(OTf)2(THF)3], with DADBC in toluene afforded [UO2(DADBC)][OTf]2, in which the UO2 2+ ion is fully encapsulated by the macrocycle. This conclusion was supported by NMR, UV-Vis, IR, and Raman spectroscopies, as well as single-crystal X-ray crystallography. Attempts to form the in-macrocycle complex of BAM, however, were unsuccessful. The reaction of BAM with [UO2(OTf)2(THF)3] in THF/CH2Cl2 unexpectedly afforded crystals of [H2 BAM][OTf]2, where the protons are derived from solvate water in the BAM crystal lattice. In contrast, reaction of BAM with UO2(NO3)2·6H2O resulted in formation of the coordination polymer, [UO2(κ2-NO3)2(μ-BAM)]∞. The crystal structure of this compound revealed that the BAM ligand is coordinated to UO2 2+ via its pendent carboxamide donors, while the donor atoms within the macrocyclic cavity remained unbound. The X-ray crystal structure of the free BAM ligand was also obtained, which showed that it exists in an identical conformation to that seen in the structure of [UO2(κ2-NO3)2(μ-BAM)]∞, where the pendent carboxamide donors are engaged in an intramolecular hydrogen-bonding interaction with the donor atoms within the macrocycle. These results suggest that the enthalpic penalty of breaking these intramolecular hydrogen bonds prevents UO2 2+ from "threading the needle." In contrast, DADBC, which lacks such intramolecular hydrogen-bonding interactions, can readily accommodate UO2 2+. This comparison demonstrates how subtle modifications to the macrocycle, such as cavity size, rigidity, and pendant donor groups, can affect its affinity for UO2 2+, and provide insights into approaches for macrocycle chelator design for this ion for applications in separations, medicine, and energy.
Related Concept Videos
Cycloaddition Reactions: MO Requirements for Thermal Activation
Cycloaddition Reactions: MO Requirements for Photochemical Activation
Nucleophilic Aromatic Substitution: Elimination–Addition
Cycloaddition Reactions: Overview
Woodward–Hoffmann Selection Rules and Microscopic Reversibility
[4+2] Cycloaddition of Conjugated Dienes: Diels–Alder Reaction

