Related Experiment Videos
The LoVe score: Development and validation of a bedside clinical index to identify patients at risk for prolonged
Paul A Hilders1,2, Lada Lijović1,3, Martijn Otten1,2
1Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Center for Critical Care Computational Intelligence, Amsterdam Medical Data Science (AMDS), Amsterdam Cardiovascular Science (ACS), Amsterdam Public Health (APH), Amsterdam Institute for Immunology and Infectious Diseases (AII), Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Background:
Early management decisions after intubation, such as humidification strategy or initiation of prevention bundles for ventilator-associated pneumonia, often depend on the expected duration of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). However, no simple, standardised method exists to support such estimates at the bedside. We aimed to develop and validate the Length of Ventilation (LoVe) index, a score to predict prolonged IMV beyond 48 h using peri-intubation data.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective cohort study using two large, publicly available ICU databases: AmsterdamUMCdb for model development and internal validation, and MIMIC-IV for external validation. The primary outcome was prolonged IMV, defined as support beyond 48 h or death within 48 h. Two LoVe variants were derived: a ventilator-inclusive version incorporating ventilator settings, and a ventilator-agnostic version without ventilator settings. Predictors identified via logistic regression were discretised into clinically interpretable ranges and summed into an additive score. Clinical utility was assessed using decision curve analysis.
Results:
In the cardiac surgery and non-cardiac surgery cohorts, the ventilator-inclusive LoVe index achieved AUROC scores of 0.82 and 0.75, respectively. The ventilator-agnostic version reached 0.72 in the non-cardiac surgery cohort. Validation in MIMIC-IV yielded 0.71 and 0.68 for the ventilator-inclusive version, and 0.71 and 0.65 for the ventilator-agnostic index. Decision curve analysis demonstrated that both LoVe indices provided meaningful clinical utility.
Conclusions:
The LoVe index provides a simple, interpretable bedside tool to estimate the likelihood of prolonged IMV early after intubation, showing consistent external validity and potential to support early ICU decision-making.
Related Concept Videos
Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation:
Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation (NIPPV)
Assessment of Ventilation II: Respiratory Depth and Rhythm
Respiratory depth measures the volume of air inhaled or exhaled during a breath. It can vary from shallow to deep and typically remains consistent when a person is at rest or asleep. Occasionally, individuals will automatically inhale deeply, known as sighing, which inflates the lungs with more air than normal breathing.
To assess respiratory depth, observe the degree of chest excursion or movement:
Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings
Guidelines For Measuring Vital Signs
Before taking a patient's vital signs, a nurse would consider and assess the patient's comfort level and ensure appropriate equipment is available.