Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 2, 2026

Whole Body Vibration Methods with Survivors of Polio
Published on: October 17, 2018
Vibrational Interventions for Sexual and Pelvic Health: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Brittany L Roberts1, Rebecca G Rogers, Karissa A Leong
1Division of Urogynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; and Division of Urogynecology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York.
Objective:
To determine whether scheduled vibrator use with an educational handout improves sexual and pelvic floor health for women with sexual dysfunction and pelvic floor disorders than the educational handout alone.
Methods:
Randomized controlled trial conducted at a single-site tertiary referral center in the United States. Enrollment occurred from November 2024 to April 2025. Women aged at least 18 years with sexual dysfunction and a pelvic floor disorder diagnosis were included. Participants were randomized to receive either a vibrator approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration with scheduled use three times weekly for 8 weeks and an educational handout (vibrator group) or the educational handout, alone (handout group). The primary outcome was sexual function measured by the FSFI (Female Sexual Function Index). Secondary outcomes included results of the SSI (Sexual Satisfaction Index), PISQ-12 (Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire-12), PFDI-20 (Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20), F-GUPI (Female Genitourinary Pain Index), and PHQ-9 (Patient Health Questionnaire-9).
Results:
Of 84 randomized participants, 81 completed the study (41 handout group, 40 vibrator group; 57.9±14.1 years). At 8 weeks, FSFI total scores were significantly higher in the vibrator group (22.2±7.5) than the handout group (16.3±8.7; P=.002), with improvements recorded across arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain domains (all P<.05). Although both groups improved from baseline, the vibrator group demonstrated greater mean FSFI improvement (8.8 points vs 4.9 points; mean difference, 4.0 points; P=.002). More participants in the vibrator group achieved normal FSFI total scores (higher than 26.5; 35.0% vs 12.2%; P=.02).
Conclusion:
For women with sexual dysfunction and pelvic floor disorders, scheduled vibrator use with an educational handout resulted in greater improvement in sexual function than an educational handout alone and may reduce urinary distress symptoms.
Clinical Trial Registration:
ClincalTrials.gov, NCT06677541.