Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 9, 2026

Measuring the Influence of Magnetic Vestibular Stimulation on Nystagmus, Self-Motion Perception, and Cognitive Performance in a 7T MRT
Published on: March 3, 2023
AI-Assisted Compressed Sensing for Optimized Inner Ear Imaging: a Multi-Rater MRI Evaluation of CSAI T2-DRIVE
Enrike Rosenkranz1, Jennifer Köhler2, Nora M Weiss2
1Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, TUM University Hospital, Rechts der Isar Hospital, Munich, Germany. enrike.rosenkranz@tum.de.
Purpose:
High-resolution T2-weighted imaging is essential for preoperative assessment before cochlear implantation. Compressed sensing (CS) with AI-based reconstruction (CSAI) reduces acquisition times whilst preserving image quality. Although CSAI has been established in various clinical applications, its performance in inner ear imaging remains unclear. This study assesses CSAI-optimized T2-DRIVE sequences at different resolutions and acquisition times for visualizing inner ear structures.
Methods:
In 30 healthy participants, CS T2-DRIVE was acquired at isotropic resolutions of 0.65, 0.5, and 0.4 mm. 0.5 and 0.4 mm datasets were also reconstructed using a commercially available AI-based reconstruction algorithm. Three raters independently assessed the imaging quality of anatomical landmarks (cochlea, semicircular canals, vestibulocochlear nerve), artifacts, and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) using a 5-point Likert scale. Each rater re-rated a subset of images after ≥ 4 weeks. Inter- and intra-rater reliability were calculated using quadratically weighted Cohen's kappa, and differences between sequences were analyzed using cumulative link mixed models (CLMM).
Results:
0.4 mm isotropic imaging exhibited lower SNR compared to CSAI 0.5 mm, regardless of reconstruction algorithm (p < 0.001). Across all raters, CSAI T2 at 0.5 mm resolution significantly improved delineation of the cochlea and vestibulocochlear nerve compared to 0.65 mm imaging (p < 0.001), while assessability of semicircular canals was reduced (p = 0.082). Acquisition times increased with higher resolutions (0.65/0.5/0.4 mm: 4:02/4:25/4:34 min).
Conclusion:
AI-driven reconstruction algorithms enable statistically significant improvements in imaging of key inner-ear structures with minimal increases in scan time at 0.5 mm resolution.
More Related Videos
08:45Mapping Cortical Dynamics Using Simultaneous MEG/EEG and Anatomically-constrained Minimum-norm Estimates: an Auditory Attention Example
Published on: October 24, 2012
14:47Combined Peripheral Nerve Stimulation and Controllable Pulse Parameter Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Probe Sensorimotor Control and Learning
Published on: April 21, 2023