Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2026

Chinese Herbal Retention Enema for the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis
Published on: May 16, 2025
Comparative Cost-Effectiveness of Advanced Treatment Sequences for Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis
Kazumasa Kamei1, Miwa Enami2, Hiroyuki Matsuda3
1Japan Access and Value, Pfizer Japan Inc., 3-22-7, Yoyogi, Shibuya-ku, Tokyo, 151-8589, Japan. Kazumasa.Kamei@pfizer.com.
Introduction:
Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory disease characterized by a relapsing course, substantial symptom burden, and long-term healthcare utilization. Although multiple advanced therapies (ATs) are available for patients with moderately to severely active UC, evidence to guide optimal treatment sequencing remains limited, particularly in Japan. This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of clinically relevant AT sequences for moderately to severely active UC in Japan.
Methods:
A hybrid decision-tree and Markov model was developed to compare AT sequences over a lifetime horizon from the payer perspective. The model captured both induction and maintenance phases for each therapy. Efficacy and safety inputs were derived from a previously published Bayesian network meta-analysis and supplemented with Japan-specific clinical and economic data. Costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) were discounted at an annual rate of 2.0%. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated, and cost-effectiveness was assessed against a Japanese cost-effectiveness threshold of JPY 7,500,000 per QALY (USD 49,547 per QALY).
Results:
A total of 79 treatment sequences were evaluated. First-line etrasimod followed by second-line upadacitinib yielded the greatest health benefit (17.801 QALYs). Four treatment sequences-infliximab followed by ustekinumab, infliximab followed by etrasimod, infliximab followed by upadacitinib, and etrasimod followed by upadacitinib-were located on the efficiency frontier. Compared with infliximab-ustekinumab, infliximab-etrasimod resulted in an ICER of JPY 1,095,181 (USD 7235) per QALY. In turn, infliximab-upadacitinib had an ICER of JPY 1,218,896 (USD 8052) per QALY compared with infliximab-etrasimod. Etrasimod-upadacitinib had an ICER of JPY 6,684,442 (USD 44,160) per QALY compared with infliximab-upadacitinib. All ICERs were below the Japanese cost-effectiveness threshold.
Conclusion:
Under the assumptions of this model, a treatment sequence with first-line etrasimod followed by second-line upadacitinib was identified as the most cost-effective strategy for advanced therapy-naïve patients with moderately to severely active UC in Japan.
Related Concept Videos
Drugs for Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis in IBD
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Inflammatory Bowel Disease IV: Pharmacological Management
Pharmacologic...
Peptic Ulcer Disease IV: Management
The therapeutic approach involves ensuring adequate rest, implementing drug therapy, promoting smoking cessation, making dietary modifications, and emphasizing long-term follow-up care.
Pharmacological management
The prevailing therapy for peptic ulcers involves a combination of managing the patient's current medication...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease II: Ulcerative Colitis
Drugs for Peptic Ulcer Disease: Sucralfate as Mucosal Protective Agents
In this scenario, mucosal protective agents like sucralfate play an essential role. Sucralfate, a complex of sulfated sucrose and aluminum hydroxide, demonstrates its usefulness in acidic conditions,...