Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2026

Improving Strength, Power, Muscle Aerobic Capacity, and Glucose Tolerance through Short-term Progressive Strength Training Among Elderly People
Published on: July 5, 2017
How Slow Should You Go? A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Resistance Training Repetition Tempo
Alysson Enes1,2, Alec Piñero1, Tom Hermann1
1Department of Exercise Science and Recreation, Applied Muscle Development Lab, CUNY Lehman College, Bronx, New York.
Abstract:
Enes, A, Piñero, A, Hermann, T, Zamanzadeh, A, Hennessy, T, Montenegro, D, Parnell, C, Jia, A, Weitzman, T, Wolf, M, Korakakis, PA, Swinton, PA, and Schoenfeld, BJ. How slow should you go? A systematic review with meta-analysis of the effect of resistance training repetition tempo on muscle hypertrophy. J Strength Cond Res 39(12): 1331-1339, 2025-We systematically searched the literature for interventions that compared different resistance training tempos for eccentric (ECC) or concentric (CON) actions. We estimated pre-/poststudy changes and between-condition differences in lean/muscle mass for healthy adults, restricting inclusion to studies that controlled all other training variables. Hierarchical meta-analyses were conducted within a Bayesian framework, with change estimates made within groups, and the primary emphasis placed on pairwise differences between dichotomously coded slower (repetition time: 1.7-4.5 seconds, averaging ∼3.5 seconds) and faster (repetition time: 0.3-2 seconds, averaging ∼1 second) interventions. When combining data across all 14 included studies (4 CON and 9 ECC manipulated interventions, 1 for both in a cross-over design), meta-analyses of within-group changes showed similar pooled effects for faster (0.43 [95% CrI: 0.29‒0.58]) and slower tempos (0.34 [95% credible interval (CrI): 0.22‒0.47)]. Meta-analyses of pairwise differences across the same studies showed central estimates that trivially favored faster over slower tempos (pooled mean = 0.09 [95% CrI: -0.04 to 0.22]), with a low probability that the between-condition effect size was at least small (p = 0.450), medium (p = 0.001), or large (p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses of pairwise differences stratified by muscle action type (ECC or CON), body region (upper or lower body), and training to failure (yes or no) generally produced trivial to small effects, although the certainty of estimates varied across analyses. In conclusion, resistance training tempo appears to have minimal overall effect on muscle hypertrophy, with potential differences emerging under specific conditions.
Related Concept Videos
Exercise and Muscle Performance
Endurance exercises
Endurance exercises involve running, swimming, or cycling, which require repetitive movements with low force output. When a person engages in endurance exercise, a few noticeable changes occur in their skeletal muscles. For instance, the number of capillaries...
Cellular Adaptation II: Hypertrophy

