Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2026

Evaluation of Commercial-Off-The-Shelf Wrist Wearables to Estimate Stress on Students
Published on: June 16, 2018
Stress or Arousal? Exercise Confounding in Wearable Stress Detection
Yiğit Aydoğan1, Federico Villagra Povina2
1Deparment of Computer Science, Aberystwyth University, Department of Computer Science Llandinam Building Aberystwyth University Aberystwyth Ceredigion SY23 3DB, Aberystwyth, Wales, SY23 3DB, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Abstract:
Wearable stress-detection models are commonly validated by separating rest from stress, but this does not establish that their outputs are specific to stress rather than broader physiological activation. We re-analysed two public wearable datasets and made a matched within-dataset stress-specificity experiment the primary test. PhysioNet event tags were used to reconstruct protocol-defined rest and stress-induction blocks; 29 participants with matched aerobic and anaerobic recordings contributed 522 rest, 192 stress, and 3431 exercise-session windows. Four feature-based classifiers were trained to distinguish rest from stress under nested leave-one-participant-out evaluation. Preprocessing, hyperparameter selection, and probability-threshold calibration used training participants only, and exercise-session data were excluded from all model development. The best calibrated model, XGBoost, achieved balanced accuracy of 0.703, stress detection of 0.604, and rest specificity of 0.801, yet labelled 82.6% of held-out exercise-session windows as stress. At participant level, its exercise-session false-stress rate was 0.840 [0.775, 0.897], compared with a rest false-stress rate of 0.221 [0.151, 0.301], giving a paired difference of 0.619 [0.537, 0.699]. Protocol-defined stress blocks also had higher self-reported stress than rest blocks (mean difference 1.22 [0.89, 1.53] on the supplied 1-10 scale; 27/29 participants; one-sided Wilcoxon p=4.64×10⁻⁶). Adding time-domain heart-rate-variability features did not materially change the result. A Wearable Stress and Affect Detection (WESAD)-to-PhysioNet transfer analysis remained poor but was treated as secondary evidence because it also contains dataset and protocol shift. These findings show that exercise-associated activation can produce substantial false-stress responses even when stress recognition and an exercise-session challenge are evaluated within the same dataset and the challenge data are excluded from model development.
More Related Videos
10:45A Community-based Stress Management Program: Using Wearable Devices to Assess Whole Body Physiological Responses in Non-laboratory Settings
Published on: January 22, 2018
05:51Assessing the Accuracy of Fitness Smartwatch Data for Cardiovascular and Physical Activity Monitoring: A Validation Study in Digital Health
Published on: February 21, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Exercise Stress Test
Exercise stress testing, commonly known as a treadmill test, is a noninvasive procedure used to evaluate cardiovascular function and diagnose heart conditions.
Definition
An exercise stress test measures the heart's response to exertion using a treadmill or stationary bicycle. Chest electrodes record the heart's electrical activity through an ECG, and blood pressure is monitored regularly.
Purposes
Introduction to Stress and Lifestyle
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques III
The Role of Exercise in Stress Management
Regular physical activity is essential for reducing stress and promoting cardiovascular health. Exercise strengthens the heart, enhances blood flow, keeps blood vessels flexible, and helps lower blood pressure, all of which reduce the body's stress response. Research shows that adults who exercise regularly have nearly half the risk...
Psychological Responses to Stress