Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 14, 2026
Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System
Published on: July 11, 2025
Development of a Computational Histology Artificial Intelligence-Powered Prognostic Biomarker in Colorectal Cancer in
Chris Lieu1, Vivek Nimgaonkar2,3, Viswesh Krishna3
1Department of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Background:
Risk stratification in colorectal cancer (CRC) plays an important role in treatment decision-making. As such, prognostic biomarkers that can augment risk stratification have clinical value. Quantitative histologic features from routine hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained whole slide images (WSIs) provide a novel avenue for biomarker discovery. In this study, we explored the potential for a computational histology artificial intelligence (CHAI) platform to develop and validate a prognostic biomarker in CRC.
Methods:
The Cancer Genome Atlas Colorectal Adenocarcinoma project was utilized for this study, with inclusion of all subjects (stage I-IV) with available digitized H&E specimens. The cohort was split into development and validation cohorts by a stratified random split. The previously developed CHAI platform was applied in the development cohort to construct a continuous risk score from histologic features associated with progression-free interval (PFI) that was dichotomized based on an optimized cutpoint for distinguishing PFI into a high risk CHAI (+) and lower risk CHAI (-). PFI was compared between CHAI (+) and CHAI (-) patients in the validation cohort in multivariable Cox proportional hazards models. Time-dependent area under the curve (tdAUC) and C-indices were also calculated for PFI.
Results:
A total of 583 participants were included in the study, with 409 assigned to the validation cohort. The CHAI biomarker classified 229 participants (56%) as CHAI (+) and 180 (44%) as CHAI (-) in the validation set. CHAI (+) participants had worse PFI in a multivariable analysis adjusting for available clinicopathologic variables (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.65; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.63-4.30). TdAUC for the CHAI biomarker was 0.60 (95% CI, 0.53-0.67) at 12 months, 0.62 (0.55-0.69) at 36 months, and 0.67 (0.55-0.79) at 60 months; the C-index was 0.62 (95% CI, 0.58-0.67).
Conclusions:
The CHAI platform was used to develop a prognostic digital pathology biomarker in CRC. This demonstrates the feasibility and potential to apply this artificial intelligence-based digital pathology biomarker platform for risk stratification in CRC and supports its further study.