Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 16, 2026

Methods for Presenting Real-world Objects Under Controlled Laboratory Conditions
Published on: June 21, 2019
High- and Low-Calorie Food Cues, Visual Attention, and Subclinical Eating Pathology in University Students Assessed
Csongor István Szepesi1,2, Viktor Rekenyi1,2, Nóra Horváth1,2
1Doctoral School of Health Sciences, University of Debrecen, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary.
Abstract:
Background/Objectives: Eating disorders are increasingly conceptualized as information-processing disorders characterized by attentional biases toward food-related stimuli. However, whether such biases are already detectable in subclinical, non-treatment-seeking populations remains unclear. This study examined whether subclinical eating pathology, assessed with the Eating Attitudes Test-26 (EAT-26), is associated with distinct patterns of visual attention toward high- and low-calorie food images in university students. Methods: In this cross-sectional observational study featuring an experimental eye-tracking task, 89 university students completed the EAT-26 and a visual task displaying paired high- and low-calorie food images alongside neutral controls. Oculomotor metrics included first fixation duration (FFD), fixation count (FC), and average fixation duration (AFD). Data were evaluated using EAT-26 threshold-based group stratification (lower-risk vs. risky eating behavior) and Spearman rank correlation analyses. Results: Global EAT-26 scores showed a significant correlation with a directional attentional bias index (rho = 0.29, p = 0.006). The Dieting subscale demonstrated no significant relationships with any oculomotor metrics. Conversely, Oral Control scores were significantly negatively correlated with the directional attentional bias index (rho = -0.27, p = 0.009) and positively tracked with low-calorie fixation counts (rho = 0.30, p = 0.004). Bulimia subscale scores showed a moderate positive correlation with the directional attentional bias index (rho = 0.26, p = 0.013), characterized by a significant decrease in low-calorie fixation counts (rho = -0.32, p = 0.002) and a strong increase in high-calorie fixation counts (rho = 0.36, p < 0.001) during sustained viewing. Conclusions: Subclinical eating pathology tendencies are associated with distinct implicit attentional profiles regarding food caloric density during sustained cognitive evaluation. Oral control drives visual prioritization of low-calorie stimuli to maintain inhibitory control, whereas bulimic tendencies reflect prolonged visual preoccupation with high-calorie reward cues. Eye-tracking represents a promising non-invasive research tool for exploring early cognitive correlates of eating-disorder risk.

