Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 18, 2026

Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
Tailoring the Atrioventricular Interval During Left Bundle Branch Pacing: Playing With Fusion
Margarida Pujol-Lopez1,2, Mariona Regany-Closa1,2, Eduard Guasch1,2,3
1Institut Clínic Cardiovascular (ICCV), Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain.
Background:
Optimization of biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with fusion (fusion-optimized intervals method) has been shown to improve left ventricular remodeling. However, information on programming the atrioventricular (AV) interval during left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is scarce.
Objective:
Assess with electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI) the electrical benefit of optimization of the AV interval during LBBP.
Methods:
Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Pilot study including patients who received LBBP with CRT indication, normal AV conduction, sinus rhythm, and left bundle branch block. ECGI was used to obtain non-invasive activation maps, ventricular activation times, and QRS widths during the optimization of the AV interval.
Results:
A total of 10 patients who received LBBP were included. Median age was 62 years (57-74 years), 40% were women, 20% had ischemic cardiomyopathy, and baseline LVEF was 29% (23%-36%). The baseline median QRS duration was 178 ms (168-187 ms), with a left ventricular activation time (LVAT) of 99 ms (90-109 ms), a right ventricular activation time (RVAT) of 42 ms (34-71 ms), and a total ventricular activation time (TAT) of 111 ms (105-131 ms). A non-tailored AV programming showed a QRS measured from intrinsic deflection of 142 ms (137-149 ms); when a tailored AV was programmed, the median QRS decreased to 124 ms (116-130 ms). Ventricular activation times showed shortening with a tailored approach.
Conclusion:
AV interval adjustment during left bundle branch pacing may result in better resynchronization.
More Related Videos
08:19Electrophysiological Assessment of Murine Atria with High-Resolution Optical Mapping
Published on: February 22, 2018
06:57Ablation of Ischemic Ventricular Tachycardia Using a Multipolar Catheter and 3-dimensional Mapping System for High-density Electro-anatomical Reconstruction
Published on: January 31, 2019
Related Concept Videos
The Cardiac Cycle
The Process
Electrical signals—sent from the sinoatrial (SA) node in the right atrial wall to the atrioventricular (AV) node between the right atrium and right ventricle—cause both atria to simultaneously contract. When the signal reaches the AV node, it pauses for approximately a tenth of a second, allowing the atria to contract and empty blood into the...
Conduction System of the Heart
The pacemaker cells are located in two primary nodes: the sinoatrial (SA) node and the atrioventricular (AV) node. The SA node pacemaker cells can autonomously depolarize, triggering an action potential that leads to the...
Motor Unit Stimulation
The latent period of contraction marks the onset of excitation-contraction coupling, when the action potential propagates across the sarcolemma, preparing the muscle fibers for contraction. As the fibers enter the contraction phase, the...
Cardiac Action Potential
The cardiac action potential process involves a series of phases characterized by the movement of ions across the cardiac cell membranes, leading to the depolarization and repolarization of the cardiac myocytes.
Ionic Basis of Cardiac Action Potentials
ECG Interpretation of Arrhythmias II: Atrial, Junctional and Ventricular Arrhythmias
Pulse rhythm
Conversely, an irregular pulse pattern is termed dysrhythmia, stemming from disruptions in cardiac muscle...