Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 27, 2026

Venous Thrombosis Assay in a Mouse Model of Cancer
Published on: January 5, 2024
Personalized Anticoagulation in Cancer Patients: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives
Ștefan Chiorescu1,2, Mihaela Mocan3,4, Bianca Patricia Dinică5
1Department of Surgery, Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Abstract:
Background and Objectives: Cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) is still a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with malignancy and represents a major challenge in cardio-oncology. Although low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) have long been the standard of care, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have broadened treatment options. However, balancing thrombotic and bleeding risks, accounting for tumor- and individual-specific characteristics, requires an individualized therapeutic approach. This review summarizes current evidence supporting personalized anticoagulation strategies in CAT. Materials and Methods: A structured narrative review supported by a systematic literature search was conducted. Evidence regarding LMWH, DOACs, and emerging factor XI/XIa inhibitors was critically appraised, with emphasis on clinical scenarios necessitating individualized management, including gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and intracranial malignancies, hepatocellular carcinoma, thrombocytopenia, renal impairment, drug-drug interactions, and recurrent thrombosis. Results: Both LMWH and DOACs are effective options for CAT, with treatment selection guided by the balance between thrombotic and bleeding risks. Among DOACs, apixaban appears to have a favorable efficacy-safety profile based on current evidence, whereas rivaroxaban and edoxaban remain suitable for carefully selected patients despite higher bleeding risk in specific settings. LMWH continues to be preferred in patients with active mucosal tumors, severe thrombocytopenia, advanced renal dysfunction, significant drug-drug interactions, or when dosing flexibility is required. Emerging evidence also points to possible pleiotropic effects of DOACs on inflammation, angiogenesis, and metastatic progression, although the results have not yet translated into proven clinical benefit. Factor XI/XIa inhibitors remain investigational, with no established role in cancer-associated thrombosis. Conclusions: Contemporary CAT management has shifted toward personalized anticoagulant selection based on tumor characteristics, bleeding risk, organ function, anticancer therapy, and patient-related factors. Future advances, including factor XI/XIa inhibitors and a better understanding of anticoagulants' biological effects beyond thrombosis prevention, may further optimize individualized treatment and improve clinical outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...
Venous Thrombosis IV: Nursing Management
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...