Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 1, 2026

Fabrication of Gate-tunable Graphene Devices for Scanning Tunneling Microscopy Studies with Coulomb Impurities
Published on: July 24, 2015
Edge Electrostatic Inhomogeneity Correlates with Hysteresis and Localized Charging in Lithographically Defined
Kavish Saini1, Sreeprasad T Sreenivasan1
1Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Texas at El Paso, El Paso, Texas79968, United States.
Abstract:
Lithographically defined graphene nanoribbons (GNRs) are attractive for graphene nanoelectronics and single-electron devices, but their performance is often limited by edge roughness, polymer residues, adsorbates, and graphene/SiO2 interfacial traps introduced during top-down processing. Here, we correlate process-defined edge disorder with local electrostatic inhomogeneity and transport stability in geometry-matched GNR devices containing a fixed central graphene island and 150, 100, or 50 nm constrictions. Smooth and rough edge classes, with representative edge roughnesses of ≈3 and ≈15 nm, respectively, are characterized by AFM, TEM, Raman spectroscopy, Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM), and temperature-dependent electrical transport. Controlled KPFM measurements, including dry-N2 controls, show that rough ribbons exhibit larger edge-basal contact-potential contrast and stronger along-edge potential fluctuations than smooth ribbons, consistent with enhanced edge-localized electrostatic disorder. These electrostatic differences correlate with broader gate-sweep hysteresis, lower transport stability, and larger effective trap signatures. Low-temperature bias spectroscopy further shows that smooth 50 nm devices exhibit cleaner localized-charging features with effective addition-energy scales up to ≈128 meV, whereas rough 50 nm devices show irregular disorder-dominated blockade features consistent with coupled puddles or multiple localized islands and a lower effective blockade energy scale of ≈4.3 meV. Across the width series, normalized roughness organizes systematic trends in mobility, on/off ratio, hysteresis, and electrostatic contrast, linking process-defined edge morphology to device-level transport response. These results establish a proof-of-concept correlation in which KPFM-derived edge electrostatic inhomogeneity, reflecting the combined process-defined edge/near-edge environment, tracks gate-sweep hysteresis and low-temperature charging behavior, identifying it as a candidate pre-cryogenic screening descriptor for lithographically patterned GNR devices and motivating validation on larger device cohorts.
Related Concept Videos
Electrostatic Boundary Conditions in Dielectrics
Consider a case where both the mediums across a boundary are two different dielectric materials. Recall that the electric field and electric displacement are proportional and related through the material's permittivity.
The Electrical Double Layer
Electrostatic Boundary Conditions
The surface integral of an electric field is given by Gauss's law in integral form and is related to...
Biasing of FET
In an N-channel JFET, the structure consists of N-type material forming the channel on a P-type substrate, with the gate...
Electric Field of a Charged Disk
The system's symmetry is in the cylindrical directions across the plane of the charge. As a result, the electric fields created by various surface charge elements nullify each other in the direction parallel to the surface. Thereby, the resulting electric field is perpendicular to the plane. Since the disk is...
Electric Field of Two Equal and Opposite Charges
A separation of the positive and negative charges can lead to a weak, remnant effect of the positive and negative charges. The expectation is that the more the distance between the positive and...

