Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 3, 2026

Development of Stem Cell-derived Antigen-specific Regulatory T Cells Against Autoimmunity
Published on: November 8, 2016
Developing and validating a regulatory science competency framework for immune cell therapy: a mixed-methods study
1College of Pharmacy, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Background:
Advanced therapy medicinal products (ATMPs), particularly immune cell therapies, present distinctive regulatory challenges due to biological variability, evolving manufacturing processes, and uncertainty throughout the product lifecycle. Existing competency frameworks for regulatory science are predominantly generalist and may not adequately capture the domain-specific competencies required for immune cell therapy.
Objective:
To develop and validate a consensus-based competency framework for regulatory science professionals in immune cell therapy.
Methods:
An exploratory sequential mixed-methods design was employed, comprising a multi-source literature review, preliminary expert consultation, semi-structured expert interviews, and a two-round Delphi consensus process. Experts representing academia, industry, regulatory authorities, and government/public-sector organizations participated in the preliminary consultation and interviews (n = 11) and the Delphi consensus process (n = 20). Qualitative data were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Delphi responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics, the content validity ratio, and the item-level content validity index to assess content validity in Round 1, and retention agreement, importance, educational applicability, and measurability in Round 2.
Results:
The final framework comprised nine core competencies and 32 sub-competencies organized into three areas: Scientific and Regulatory Foundations, Strategic Application of Regulatory Science, and Regulatory Leadership and Responsibility. High retention agreement (95%-100%) indicated the stability of the framework. Sub-competencies related to leadership, ethics, and higher-order judgment received relatively lower ratings for educational applicability and measurability but were retained because of their conceptual importance.
Conclusion:
This study presents a domain-specific competency framework that conceptualizes regulatory competence in immune cell therapy as an integrative and adaptive capability. The framework provides a practical foundation for competency-based training, assessment, and regulatory science workforce development in immune cell therapy and related ATMPs.

