Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 9, 2026

Application of End-to-end Anastomosis in Robotic Central Pancreatectomy
Published on: June 2, 2018
Textbook outcome after robotic pancreatic enucleation: a two-center evaluation of an ideal perioperative pathway
Marionna Cathomas1, Zheng Li2, Benedict Kinny-Köster1
1Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
Introduction:
Robotic pancreatic enucleation (rPE) has emerged as a parenchyma-sparing surgical approach for benign or low-grade malignant pancreatic lesions. However, standardized metrics to assess perioperative quality are lacking. This study aimed to propose an rPE-specific textbook outcome (rPE-TO) reflecting an ideal perioperative pathway and to evaluate its applicability in two independent institutional cohorts.
Material And Methods:
Patients undergoing completed rPE at University Hospital Heidelberg, Germany, between April 2023 and March 2025 were analyzed, and the proposed rPE-TO was additionally evaluated in an independent institutional cohort from Johns Hopkins University, Maryland, USA. The rPE-TO comprised six components: no conversion to open surgery, no incomplete resection requiring reoperation, no clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), no major complications (Clavien-Dindo < IIIa, with POPF assessed separately), no readmission within 30 days, and no mortality within 90 days.
Results:
The Heidelberg cohort included 31 patients, of whom 20 (64.5%) achieved rPE-TO. Among the individual components, conversion to open surgery occurred in 4 patients (12.9%), incomplete resection requiring reoperation in 1 (3.2%), POPF in 6 (19.4%), major complications in 2 (6.5%), and 30-day readmission in 2 (6.5%); no 90-day mortality occurred. In the Johns Hopkins cohort (n = 48), rPE-TO was achieved in 29 patients (60.4%). Despite comparable overall rPE-TO rates, the distribution of individual failure components differed between institutions. In addition, length of hospital stay was shorter among patients achieving rPE-TO in both cohorts.
Conclusion:
Textbook outcome was achieved in approximately two thirds of patients undergoing rPE in both institutional cohorts. The proposed rPE-TO integrates established perioperative quality measures with procedure-specific outcomes and may provide a composite measure for assessing an ideal perioperative pathway after robotic pancreatic enucleation.

