Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 9, 2026

Targeted Next-generation Sequencing and Bioinformatics Pipeline to Evaluate Genetic Determinants of Constitutional Disease
Published on: April 4, 2018
RET Variant Reclassification across Demographic Sub-Groups in a Large-Scale Clinical Population
Kirkpatrick B Fergus1, Marcy E Richardson2, Elad Ziv3
1Department of Surgery, University of California-San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, USA.
Background:
The expanded use of germline testing panels that include the RET proto-oncogene has identified many variants of uncertain significance (VUSs). It remains poorly understood how many RET VUSs are returned in clinical practice, how many are ultimately reclassified, and which patient populations are affected most.
Methods:
We conducted a nationwide retrospective cohort study of individuals tested for RET germline variants between 2017 and 2024 as part of routine clinical diagnostic testing at Ambry Genetics. Samples underwent next-generation sequencing, and variants were reported with their associated five-tier pathogenicity classification. Variant reclassification was measured as a change between initial and updated classification status on a per-variant and per-person basis. Test requisition forms, pedigrees, and clinic notes were used to associate genetic test results with demographic and clinical patient characteristics.
Results:
Among 616,077 individuals who underwent RET germline genetic testing that included RET, 969 (0.2%) had a RET PV, and 5516 (0.9%) had a RET VUS. A total of 1607 (29%) individuals with initial RET VUSs were reclassified. Most variants (164/166; 98.8%) and individuals (1605/1607; 99.9%) were reclassified as benign. The prevalence of VUS on initial classification was significantly higher in individuals self-reporting as Asian (1.5%), Black (1.3%), and Hispanic (1%) compared with those self-reporting as White (0.8%). Reclassification reduced the proportion of VUSs within race and ethnicity groups, but relative differences remained statistically significant.
Conclusions:
The expansion of RET germline testing coincided with substantial reclassification of VUSs, highlighting the importance of periodic laboratory reassessment. Most reclassifications were benign, which is cautiously reassuring for clinical counseling of patients. Both further characterization of RET variants and society guidance on clinical management of VUS test results are needed as genetic testing continues to expand.
Related Concept Videos
Classification of Illness
An illness is a response to a disease in which the person's level of functioning is changed compared with a previous level. The general classification of illness includes acute and chronic.
Acute illness is severe and...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Principles of Pharmacogenetics: Types of Genetic Variants
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies
Regression Toward the Mean
Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data