Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 15, 2026

Solid-state Graft Copolymer Electrolytes for Lithium Battery Applications
Published on: August 12, 2013
Solvent-dependent electrochemical performance of UPyMA-PETEA supramolecular gel polymer electrolytes for
Toshiki Aizawa1, Toshiki Iwato1, Hayato Takada1
1Materials Science and Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering and Science, Shibaura Institute of Technology Toyosu, Koto-Ku Tokyo 135-8548 Japan.
Abstract:
Supramolecular gel polymer electrolytes (SGPEs) based on UPyMA and PETEA were prepared with 1 M LiTFSI and 10 wt% TTE using sulfolane, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), N,N-dimethylacetamide (DMA), or N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) as the solvent. Structural characterization supported polymer formation and retention of the UPy hydrogen-bonding motifs. The solvent-dependent physicochemical and electrochemical characteristics of the formulations were compared by thermal analysis, viscosity measurements, electrochemical characterization, and Li-O2 cell testing. Among the tested SGPEs, the sulfolane-based formulation exhibited the highest apparent anodic oxidation onset, approximately 5.5 V vs. Li/Li+ under the employed linear-sweep voltammetry conditions. At 0.05 mA cm-2, the DMSO-based cell delivered a full-discharge capacity of 3135 mAh g-1, compared with 2133 mAh g-1 for the sulfolane-based cell. In contrast, under capacity-limited cycling at 500 mAh g-1, the sulfolane-based cell showed the longest cycling among the tested formulations, with the reported trace maintaining discharge capacities above 400 mAh g-1 through 30 cycles. Post-cycling FE-SEM and XRD revealed cathode deposits and changes in detectable crystalline products between discharge and charge. These results demonstrate divergent solvent-dependent performance within a common SGPE framework: DMSO favored full-discharge capacity, whereas sulfolane favored extended capacity-limited cycling under the tested conditions. The findings highlight that maximizing discharge capacity and sustaining repeated cycling represent distinct considerations in solvent selection for Li-O2 SGPEs.
