Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 15, 2026

Simultaneous Laryngopharyngeal and Conventional Esophageal pH Monitoring
Published on: December 14, 2020
Modern Approach to Reflux Testing: When, Which, and How?
Walter W Chan1, Matthew K Schroeder2, Muhammad Hashim Hayat1
1Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Abstract:
Modern reflux monitoring technology provides for both prolonged wireless and 24-hour catheter-based testing options. Wireless pH monitoring offers the advantages of patient comfort and prolonged assessment for up to 96 hours to account for day-to-day variation of GERD, but only distal acid reflux is measured. pH-impedance monitoring detects all reflux episodes regardless of acidity, characterizes refluxate content, identifies proximal extent, and measures baseline mucosal impedance which reflects mucosal integrity as well as longitudinal reflux-related injury, but the indwelling catheter causes patient discomfort and limits monitoring to 24 hours. Metrics from reflux monitoring and findings from endoscopy, together with adjunctive tests such as high-resolution manometry, can provide conclusive and/or supportive evidence for or against pathologic reflux, utilizing the Lyon Consensus 2.0 framework. Selection of optimal testing strategy should depend on presenting symptom phenotypes, clinical indications and scenarios, local testing options, and patient tolerance. Testing should be performed off acid suppressive therapy for patients with unproven GERD, while those with proven GERD and persistent symptoms despite optimized anti-reflux therapy should undergo pH-impedance monitoring on acid suppression. If endoscopy is indicated, wireless monitoring can be performed at the same setting, especially for typical perceptive (heartburn, chest pain) symptoms. pH-impedance monitoring is preferred for primary regurgitation and belching, while both modalities are options for atypical symptoms. Reflux monitoring may be indicated for assessing symptoms after foregut interventions, although no consensus on post-operative thresholds or optimal testing methodology has been established. Reflux monitoring is a valuable tool for evaluating and directing management of esophageal symptoms.
Related Concept Videos
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease II: Clinical Features and Management
Clinical Manifestations
GERD presents itself in a multitude of ways, with symptoms varying from person to person. The hallmark symptoms are...
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease I: Meaning and Pathophysiology
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure entails...
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.

