Related Experiment Videos
Development and validation of a symptom assessment scale for gastric cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy:
Peirong Xu1, Yuee Wen2, Ting Luo1
1School of Nursing, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, 510080, China.
Purpose:
To develop and validate a symptom assessment scale for gastric cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy based on the COSMIN framework and the Symptom Experience Model.
Methods:
An exploratory mixed methods design was used. Initial items were constructed through literature review, theoretical framework analysis, and qualitative interviews (n = 20), refined by Delphi consultation (n = 14) and psychometrically tested in 384 patients from three tertiary hospitals. Item analysis, content validity, structural validity, reliability, and known-group validity were evaluated. Structural validity was examined using exploratory factor analysis (EFA), parallel analysis, exploratory graph analysis (EGA), and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).
Results:
The final instrument consisted of 25 symptom items and 6 symptom-interference items. Item analysis resulted in the removal of one item with inadequate result. Content validity was satisfactory, with item-level content validity indices ranging from 0.78 to 1.00 and a scale-level content validity index of 0.94. EFA, parallel analysis, and EGA collectively supported a four-factor structure comprising emotional-psychological symptoms, treatment-related systemic symptoms, gastrointestinal symptoms, and systemic/metabolic symptoms. CFA confirmed acceptable model fit (χ2/df = 2.119, RMSEA = 0.070, CFI = 0.911, TLI = 0.901, IFI = 0.912). Discriminant validity was supported (HTMT< 0.85). The overall scale demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.926; McDonald's ω = 0.929) and acceptable split-half reliability (0.746). Significant differences were observed between clinically distinct patient groups, supporting known-group validity.
Conclusion:
The developed symptom assessment scale demonstrates satisfactory validity and reliability, and may serve as a valuable instrument for symptom assessment and supportive care in this population.