Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 19, 2026
Measuring the Carotid to Femoral Pulse Wave Velocity (Cf-PWV) to Evaluate Arterial Stiffness
Published on: May 3, 2018
Differences in Office and Ambulatory Pulse Wave Analysis in Patients with White Coat Hypertension and Other
Ann-Kathrin Carolin Schäfer1, Eva Maria Nuhn2, Stephan Lüders2,3
1Department of Nephrology & Rheumatology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany. ann-kathrin.schaefer@med.uni-goettingen.de.
Introduction:
Increased arterial stiffness is a sign of vascular damage; therefore, assessing it is crucial for evaluating cardiovascular risk. Arterial stiffness parameters such as pulse wave velocity (PWV) and augmentation index (at heart rate 75 bpm, AIX@75) were shown to correlate directly with blood pressure (BP).
Aim:
Since these parameters may consequently be altered in patients with white coat effect (WCE), this study examined differences in office and 24h measurements of these parameters across various BP phenotypes.
Methods:
In this multicenter cross-sectional study, conducted between 2018 and 2023 at three nephrology clinics, office and 24h BP measurements and pulse wave analysis (PWA) of 208 patients were examined.
Results:
189 patients were included; 48 were diagnosed with controlled hypertension (HTN), 63 with uncontrolled HTN, 22 with a masked HTN phenotype, 30 with WCE, of whom 11 had white coat HTN (WCH) and 19 had white coat uncontrolled HTN (WCUH), and 26 had normal BP. By definition, patients with WCE had significantly higher office peripheral and aortic BP than the respective 24h values (p<0.0001 each). Their AIX@75 was significantly higher on office (32.7±11.4%) than on 24h measurement (27.4±7.2%, p=0.0354), and they showed a significantly greater reduction in PWV between office and 24h measurement than normotensives and all other BP phenotypes (padj <0.0001 each).
Conclusions:
In patients with WCE, there are significant differences in arterial stiffness parameters between office and 24h measurements, suggesting that both measurement methods provide complementary hemodynamic information. Prospective studies are needed to determine the prognostic significance of these differences.
Related Concept Videos
01:28Special considerations while measuring blood pressure
Monitoring Both Arms:
Monitoring BP in both arms during the initial assessment is advisable, as the systolic value may differ by five to ten mm Hg between arms. For subsequent BP assessments, use the arm with the higher reading.
01:30Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
01:21Sites for measuring blood pressure
The Brachial Artery: Primary Site for Blood Pressure Measurement
01:17Measurement of Blood Pressure
01:30Equipments Used To Measure Blood Pressure
This invasive approach involves cannulating a peripheral artery. During each cardiac contraction, pressure generates mechanical motion within the catheter, transmitted through rigid, fluid-filled tubing to a transducer. This transducer converts mechanical motion into electrical signals displayed as waveforms on a monitor. An automatic flushing system prevents blood backflow. Due to the potential risk of unexpected arterial blood loss, this method is primarily used in intensive...
01:19Assessing Blood pressure using a doppler ultrasound
Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Doppler Ultrasound Blood Pressure Assessment:
Preparation of Equipment: