Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 25, 2026

Precision Implementation of Minimal Erythema Dose (MED) Testing to Assess Individual Variation in Human Inflammatory Response
Published on: October 3, 2019
Patch Testing for Implanted Medical Device-Related Delayed Hypersensitivity Reactions: Retrospective Analysis of
Amber Reck Atwater1,2, Beiyu Liu3, Cynthia L Green3
1From the Department of Dermatology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Background:
Medical implants are often suspected of causing allergic reactions.
Objective:
To determine results for 2016-2022 North American Contact Dermatitis Group implant patch testing.
Methods:
Retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of clinical findings and patch test results.
Results:
Of 128 Pre-implant cases, 57.8% had ≥1 positive patch test reaction (PPTR). Top implant sites were knee and hip (62.7%). Top PPTRs were nickel 5% (43.0%), nickel 2.5% (29.1%), vanadium (14.3%), and cobalt (11%). Of 170 Post-implant cases, 45.3% had no dermatitis, 29.8% had dermatitis at the implant site, and 14.9% had scattered/generalized distribution. Top implant sites were knee and hip (66.8%). There was ≥1 PPTR in 35.9% of patients. 27/43 (62.8%) allergens ever tested positive, and of these, 77.8% (21/27) had current relevance. Top PPTR were nickel 5% (16.5%), nickel 2.5% (12.9%), cobalt (6.5%), and neomycin (5.9%). Of 170 cases, 18 (10.6%) were diagnosed with allergic contact dermatitis at implant site due to implant, with top allergens titanium oxalate (n = 4), tobramycin (n = 3), cobalt (n = 3), and nickel 5% (n = 3).
Conclusions:
Over half of Pre-implant and just over 1/3 of Post-implant patients had ≥1 PPTR. About 10% of Post-implant patients were diagnosed with allergic contact dermatitis at implant site due to implant. Outcomes data are needed to confirm relevance.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Toxicity: Allergic Reactions
Hypersensitivity Reactions: Delayed Hypersensitivity Reactions
Allergic Reactions: Anaphylaxis
