Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 26, 2026

The Multiple Sclerosis Performance Test (MSPT): An iPad-Based Disability Assessment Tool
Published on: June 30, 2014
Psychosocial disability in Australia: Prevalence, functional severity and population projections to 2060 from
Kuo-Yi Jade Chang1, Bernadette Mullin1, Firew Tekle Bobo1
1Centre for Disability Research and Policy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Background:
Existing approaches to estimating psychosocial disability - arising from severe mental illness - rely heavily on diagnostic categories and health service utilisation. By neglecting functional-limitation and participation restriction, such approaches limit the utility of current estimates for planning disability supports. This study addresses that gap by estimating the prevalence, functional severity and projected population counts of psychosocial disability in Australia, aligned with the World Health Organization International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health framework.
Methods:
Using a repeated cross-sectional design, we analysed four waves of the nationally representative Survey of Disability, Ageing and Carers (2009, 2012, 2015, 2018). Psychosocial disability was operationally defined as a long-term mental health condition combined with disability, consistent with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health framework. Survey-weighted prevalence was estimated overall and by functional severity. Pooled age- and sex-specific prevalence rates were then applied to three population growth scenarios to project counts to 2060.
Results:
Prevalence remained stable at 1.0% across all waves, with population counts rising from ~196,600 (2009) to ~243,800 (2018), reflecting demographic growth. People with psychosocial disability were disproportionately middle-aged, Australian-born, socioeconomically disadvantaged and living outside major cities. Under the medium growth scenario, projected counts increase from ~274,000 (2025) to ~410,000 (2060; +50%), with those experiencing profound limitation projected to nearly double (+92%).
Conclusion:
Shifting from diagnosis- to function-based estimation, this study provides a policy-relevant basis for psychosocial disability planning. Rapid growth in the number of profound psychosocial disability underscores the need for early intervention and coordinated psychosocial supports beyond Australia's National Disability Insurance Scheme.
Related Concept Videos
Autism Spectrum Disorder
These core symptoms manifest differently among individuals, ranging from mild to severe. The disorder's complexity extends beyond its clinical presentation, encompassing a diverse range of biological, cognitive, and sociocultural influences.
Intellectual Disability
Psychological and Sociocultural Causes of Schizophrenia
Theoretical Approaches to Psychological Disorder
Biological approach
The biological approach posits that internal, organic factors are the primary causes of such disorders. This perspective emphasizes brain structure and function, genetic predispositions, and neurotransmitter imbalances. For example, schizophrenia has been associated with both genetic...
Prevalence and Incidence
Prevalence indicates the proportion of individuals in a population who have a specific disease or health condition at a...
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)