Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 28, 2026

SECONDs Administration Guidelines: A Fast Tool to Assess Consciousness in Brain-injured Patients
Published on: February 6, 2021
State Medical Board Disciplinary Actions Related to Medical Knowledge Deficits
Lauren M Duhigg1, Lorna Lynn, Randall S Edson
1Ms. Duhigg: Senior Research Associate, American Board of Internal Medicine, Philadelphia, PA. Dr. Lynn: Vice President, Medical Education Research, American Board of Internal Medicine, Philadelphia, PA. Dr. Edson: Emeritus Professor, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, and Field Representative, Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, Chicago, IL. Dr. Battaglia: Chief Medical Officer, Strategic Alliances, American Board of Internal Medicine, Philadelphia, PA. Dr. Gray: Principal Health Services Researcher, American Board of Internal Medicine, Philadelphia, PA. Dr. McDonald: President and Chief Executive Officer, American Board of Internal Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, Attending Physician, J. Edwin Wood Clinic, Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, and Adjunct Professor of Medicine, the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania.
Introduction:
The proportion of state medical board disciplinary actions taken due to medical knowledge deficits is not known. We measured the percentage of disciplinary actions with medical knowledge deficits and the association between disciplinary actions and board certification exam performance, among American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) physicians in California.
Methods:
We investigated all physicians in California with an ABIM identification number who were disciplined from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2022. We reviewed disciplinary documentation on California's medical board website for each physician and determined through a systematic process whether actions had to do with a medical knowledge deficit. We also examined the association between these disciplinary actions and whether a physician failed on their first certification exam attempt using a chi-squared analysis.
Results:
Among the 558 California disciplinary actions from 2011 to 2022, 52.3% were related to a medical knowledge deficit. In addition, 43.7% were not related to medical knowledge, and 3.9% had an 'Ambiguous' classification. Physicians who had a disciplinary action associated with a medical knowledge deficit were less likely to have passed the initial certification exam on the first attempt (chi-square=3.90, P = .048).
Discussion:
About half of the disciplinary actions received by physicians in California with an ABIM identification number were related to medical knowledge deficits and these types of disciplinary actions were more likely among physicians who failed to pass the ABIM certification exam on the first attempt compared with those who passed. Since medical knowledge can potentially be improved, this finding allows for the possibility of a reduction in future disciplinary actions.
Related Concept Videos
Ethical Issues
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Torts III
Quasi-intentional torts in healthcare involve acts where intent is not directed to harm an individual but results in harm due to careless or reckless speech.
Torts I
Intentional...
Obedience
Torts II
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities III
Cultivating a culture of collaboration and mutual respect among nurses transcends mere enhancement...