Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 28, 2026

Assessment of Vascular Function in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease
Published on: June 16, 2014
Vascular Phenotyping Across the CKM Syndrome: Arterial Stiffness and Endothelial Function Testing, Prognostic Value
Cezara-Andreea Gerdanovics1, Teodora-Gabriela Alexescu1, Cezar Login2
14th Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Abstract:
Cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic (CKM) syndrome represents a continuum of metabolic, renal, and cardiovascular abnormalities in which vascular dysfunction may develop before clinically overt cardiovascular disease. Endothelial dysfunction, arterial stiffness, microvascular abnormalities, and structural vascular damage may therefore provide complementary information regarding vascular injury across CKM stages. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on the pathophysiological basis, non-invasive assessment, prognostic value, and clinical implementation of vascular phenotyping across the CKM spectrum, with particular emphasis on arterial stiffness and endothelial function. The principal approaches discussed include carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV), brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity, flow-mediated dilation (FMD), peripheral arterial tonometry, microvascular techniques, and structural markers such as coronary artery calcium (CAC) and carotid plaque, considered in the context of contemporary CKM staging and PREVENT-based risk assessment. Among functional vascular measures, cfPWV remains the best-validated non-invasive marker of aortic stiffness and is independently associated with cardiovascular and renal outcomes, whereas FMD provides complementary information on conduit-artery endothelial function but is limited by technical requirements and inconsistent incremental predictive value. Microvascular and glycocalyx-based techniques remain less standardized, while structural phenotyping, particularly CAC and carotid plaque assessment, has stronger evidence for risk reclassification in selected populations. Vascular phenotyping should therefore be regarded as a selective, risk-adapted strategy rather than a universal screening approach. Its greatest potential may lie in integrating vascular measures with CKM stage, PREVENT estimates, kidney and cardiac biomarkers, and structural imaging to identify disproportionate or subclinical vascular injury, particularly during progression from CKM stage 2 to stage 3. Prospective studies are needed to determine whether such multimodal phenotyping improves therapeutic decision-making and cardiovascular and kidney outcomes.
More Related Videos
06:04Pulse-Wave Velocity, Flow-Mediated Dilation, and Carotid Intima-Media Thickness to Assess Cardiovascular Risk in Population with Metabolic Syndrome
Published on: September 27, 2024
09:33A Methodological Approach to Non-invasive Assessments of Vascular Function and Morphology
Published on: February 7, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System I: Cardiac Biomarkers
The essential diagnostic tools for detecting myocardial necrosis and monitoring individuals suspected of having acute coronary syndrome (ACS) include:
Troponins
Troponins, particularly cardiac troponins I and T, are the most precise and sensitive markers of myocardial injury. They are detectable within 4-6 hours of myocardial injury and remain...
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Atherosclerosis II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Tests
Vascular Resistance
The primary determinants of vascular resistance are vessel diameter, blood viscosity, and vessel length. Among these, vessel diameter plays the most significant role due to the fourth power relationship described by...
Aortic Regurgitation II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests