Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 29, 2026

Machine Learning Algorithms for Early Detection of Bone Metastases in an Experimental Rat Model
Published on: August 16, 2020
Externally validated MRI radiomics machine learning models for differentiating between myxoid liposarcoma and myxoma
Yung Hsin Chen1, Soheil Bazanjani2,3, Zhe Wang1
1Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Objective:
To develop and externally validate a radiomics-based machine learning model for differentiating myxoid liposarcoma (MLS) from myxoma on MRI and compare its diagnostic performance with that of experienced musculoskeletal radiologists.
Methods:
In this retrospective study, T1-weighted and fluid-sensitive MRI sequences from 109 patients with histologically confirmed MLS or myxoma were used to train support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and XGBoost (XGB) classifiers. Models were evaluated in an independent external cohort of 32 patients from a second institution using different scanner hardware and protocols. Diagnostic performance was compared with that of two fellowship-trained senior musculoskeletal radiologists. Secondary analysis assessed MLS grading.
Results:
The T1-weighted SVM achieved the strongest external binary performance (accuracy, 0.84; AUC, 0.91), outperforming RF and XGB (p = 0.005 and p < 0.001, respectively). Its performance did not differ significantly from that of radiologists (AUC, 0.88-0.94; p > 0.05), although the study was not powered to establish equivalence. Fluid-sensitive SVM performance was limited (accuracy, 0.56; AUC, 0.60), indicating sequence-dependent generalizability. Models and radiologists demonstrated limited MLS grading accuracy, reflecting tumor heterogeneity.
Conclusion:
Externally validated radiomics-based machine learning supported noninvasive differentiation of MLS from myxoma primarily on T1-weighted MRI. T1-weighted SVM performance was not significantly different from that of experienced radiologists, although equivalence was not established, whereas fluid-sensitive performance was substantially weaker. T1-weighted quantitative imaging biomarkers may complement soft tissue tumor characterization, but extrapolation to fluid-sensitive sequences requires caution.