Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 29, 2026

Three-Dimensional Preoperative Virtual Planning in Derotational Proximal Femoral Osteotomy
Published on: February 17, 2023
Algorithmic determination of femoral neck axis in Birmingham hip resurfacing: A parametric CAD-based method
Michał P Kowalik1, Dawid Knaś1, Krzysztof Zawiśliński1,2
1Institute of Aeronautics and Applied Mechanics (IAAM), Warsaw University of Technology, Warsaw, Poland.
Purpose:
Birmingham hip resurfacing requires precise determination of the femoral head-neck axis to minimize risks of neck fracture, cortical notching, and component malposition. Existing methods rely on intraoperative estimation, generic guides, or semi-manual planning, all susceptible to anatomical variability. This study presents an automated parametric algorithm for determining the femoral neck axis from computed tomography (CT)-derived models to support patient-specific surgical planning.
Methods:
The method utilizes segmented CT data converted to Standard for the Exchange of Product model data format. Following artifact removal, the algorithm performs iterative cross-sectional analysis along the neck axis, identifying characteristic anatomical points: the neck isthmus, head centroid, and head apex. The axis is approximated from these points and refined through rotational optimization in 5 degree and 0.5 degree increments. The algorithm was evaluated on 4 femoral models in 5 spatial orientations each (20 test cases).
Results:
The algorithm achieved a mean validation score of 4.1/5.0 (82%). Three models with high-quality meshes scored 4-5, while one model with extensive artifacts scored 1-2, confirming sensitivity to input data quality. Repeatability was plus/minus 0.5 degrees in angular orientation and plus/minus 0.2 mm in isthmus position. Error propagation analysis indicated that CT-induced uncertainty (approximately 1.6 degrees upper bound) constitutes the limiting factor, not algorithmic precision. Physical prototyping confirmed viability for patient-specific instrument design.
Conclusion:
The method provides reproducible, automated femoral neck axis determination with plus/minus 0.5 degrees repeatability - approximately three times smaller than CT-induced uncertainty and an order of magnitude below the 5-7 degree errors of conventional jigs. Future work should validate the method against clinical outcomes in larger cohorts.

