Fetal and neonatal outcomes in planned versus unplanned pregnancies in people with spina bifida
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 31, 2026
Modeling Encephalopathy of Prematurity Using Prenatal Hypoxia-ischemia with Intra-amniotic Lipopolysaccharide in Rats
Published on: November 20, 2015
Anne Berndl1, Georgia Condran2, Julia Kfouri1
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Introduction:
There is limited information on the impact of pregnancy planning on neonatal outcomes in people with spina bifida (SB).
Methods:
This study is a sub-group analysis of The Spina Bifida Reproductive Health and Pregnancy Study, an online international cross-sectional survey. Pregnancy, birth and neonatal data were assessed using descriptive and chi-squared analyses.
Results:
A total of 209 pregnancies were included: 108 planned and 101 unplanned. The unplanned group included a greater risk of miscarriage/ectopic pregnancy (30%), unplanned fetal loss (34%), intrauterine growth restriction less than 5th percentile (16%) and babies with congenital anomalies. There was no statistically significant difference between unplanned and planned pregnancies in terms of admission to neonatal intensive care unit or risk of preterm birth.
Conclusion:
People with SB have rates of unplanned pregnancy similar to the general population. Unplanned pregnancies appear to have increased fetal and neonatal risks. Findings suggest that pregnancy planning is a modifiable factor, which may improve outcomes.