Long-Term Crestal Bone Stability Following Immediate Implant Placement in the Esthetic Zone: A Clinical Case Series Using Ritter RI-Quadro Spiral Implants
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 31, 2026

Real-Time Dynamic Navigation System for the Precise Quad-Zygomatic Implant Placement in a Patient with a Severely Atrophic Maxilla
Published on: October 18, 2021
Manuel de la Rosa-Garza1, Gregori M Kurtzman2
1Periodontology, Private Practice, Nuevo León, MEX.
Abstract:
Long-term implant success depends on more than implant survival. Maintenance of crestal bone and the surrounding soft tissue architecture becomes increasingly important as restorations remain in function for many years, particularly in the esthetic zone. This case series presents three patients treated with five Ritter RI-Quadro Spiral implants (Ritter Implants, San Antonio, Texas) in the anterior maxilla and followed for approximately 8-10 years. The clinical situations included immediate implant placement into extraction sites, facial osseous defects, guided bone regeneration, connective tissue grafting, platelet-rich fibrin, and partial extraction therapy. Insertion torque ranged from 35 to 45 N cm. All five implants remained functional during the observation period, and serial radiographs showed stable peri-implant crestal bone without progressive marginal bone loss, peri-implant radiolucency, or implant instability. The peri-implant soft tissues also remained clinically stable, with no biologic or mechanical complications requiring implant removal or replacement. Because the original treatment was not performed as a prospective study, standardized calibrated radiographs were not available, and bone-level changes could only be assessed qualitatively. Within those limitations, these cases demonstrate favorable long-term hard- and soft-tissue stability around the implants when used as part of a prosthetically driven approach that included appropriate regenerative therapy and maintenance. Larger prospective studies with standardized quantitative measurements are needed to determine how much of the observed stability can be attributed to implant design versus other surgical, restorative, and patient-related factors.
