Structural mechanisms underlying resistance to Switch-II pocket inhibitors in KRAS
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 31, 2026

Implementation of In Vitro Drug Resistance Assays: Maximizing the Potential for Uncovering Clinically Relevant Resistance Mechanisms
Published on: December 9, 2015
Matthew J Whitley1, Marcin Dyba1, Mayukh Chakrabarti1
1NCI RAS Initiative, Cancer Research Technology Program, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, MD, USA.
Abstract:
Direct targeting of KRAS through the Switch-II pocket is an effective therapeutic strategy, but acquired resistance limits clinical benefit. We examine clinically observed resistance mutations (R68S, H95Q, Y96C, Y96D and Q99L) arising during KRAS G12C inhibitor therapy using biochemical, structural, computational and cellular approaches. Covalent and noncovalent binding measurements reveal mutation- and inhibitor-specific reductions in drug engagement across inhibitor classes. Structural analyses identify two principal resistance mechanisms: Type I, involving loss of key inhibitor contacts, and Type II, involving stabilization of pocket-occluding Switch-II conformations. Y96D exhibits both mechanisms through nucleotide-dependent non-native intramolecular interactions, whereas R68S primarily exhibits Type I resistance with modest Type II effects on pocket architecture and Switch-region dynamics. Y96C, H95Q and Q99L predominantly exhibit Type I resistance. All mutants retain RAF1 binding, whereas PI3Kα binding is selectively reduced by R68S and Q99L. Together, these findings provide structural insights for understanding on-target resistance to Switch-II pocket inhibitors.
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Inhibition of Cdk Activity
The Ras Gene
Ras is a superfamily...
Electron Transport Chain: Complex I and II
ROS generation is regulated and maintained at moderate levels necessary...
Covalently Linked Protein Regulators
These groups modify specific amino acids in a protein.
Interactions Between Signaling Pathways
Convergence and divergence, and cross-talk between signaling pathways
Two distinct signaling pathways can converge on a single functional unit, which may either be a single protein or a complex of proteins. The response is either functionally distinct or synergistic between the two pathways but different from the response...
