Examined lymph node count as an independent predictive biomarker for adjuvant systemic therapy efficacy in stage IB lung adenocarcinoma
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 31, 2026

Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
Ruifeng Xu1, Zhiwen Luo2, Hai Chen3
1Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100021, China.
Background:
Adjuvant systemic therapy (AST) utility for stage IB lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) remains controversial due to the lack of objective metrics for staging adequacy. We aimed to establish an evidence-based threshold for "unknown nodal status" (Nx) and evaluate examined lymph node (ELN) count as a predictive biomarker for AST benefit.
Methods:
Data from a multicenter cohort (N = 443) and SEER database (N = 4,636) were analyzed. Adjuvant systemic therapy (AST) in this study specifically referred to traditional platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. LOWESS regression identified mortality risk inflection points. Propensity score matching (PSM, SMD ≤ 0.12) evaluated AST efficacy across ELN strata.
Results:
LOWESS modeling identified 11 ELNs as the optimal staging threshold. In the local cohort, patients with < 11 ELNs without AST had significantly worse survival ( P < 0.0001); however, AST was associated with significantly improved survival in this subgroup(Adjusted HR 0.24, 95% CI 0.07-0.89, P = 0.033). This compensatory trend was corroborated by SEER (P = 0.0033). Conversely, for thoroughly evaluated "true N0" patients (≥ 11 ELNs), AST provided no survival improvement (Adjusted HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.27-3.19, P = 0.916).
Conclusions:
ELN count is a robust gatekeeper for AST efficacy. An ELN < 11 could help clarify Nx status and serve as a strong clinical indicator suggesting potential benefit from AST in stage IB LUAD.
Trial Registration:
The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College (IRB -24/660-4940). All participants provided written informed consent.