Nanoimaging, Spectroscopy, and Biosensor Assays for Alternatively Spliced RNA Isoforms in Disease Diagnostics
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 31, 2026

Quantitative Analysis of Alternative Pre-mRNA Splicing in Mouse Brain Sections Using RNA In Situ Hybridization Assay
Published on: August 26, 2018
Ulhas S Kadam1, Zhongwu Zhou2, Joseph Irudayaraj3
1Plant Molecular Biology and Biotechnology Research Centre, and Division of Applied Life Science, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju-si 52828, Republic of Korea.
Abstract:
Alternative splicing (AS) generates distinct mRNA isoforms, and frequently distinct proteins, from single genes; its dysregulation is established in cancer, neurodegeneration, and immune disease. Sequencing now nominates candidate splice events at scale, but a nominated event does not become a usable measurement until an isoform-discriminating sequence has been converted into a physical signal. Existing AS reviews concentrate on sequencing workflows, computational event calling, or disease catalogs; the assay-engineering step that follows target nomination remains comparatively underserved, and it is where most translational failures occur. This review addresses that gap. We group postsequencing detection into five classes defined by the physical origin of the signal: (i) fixed-tissue in situ localization, (ii) live-cell RNA imaging, (iii) plasmonic and spectroscopic readouts, (iv) label-free nanophotonic biosensing combined with site-specific RNA processing, and (v) protein-level proteogenomic confirmation. These classes are compared on target definition, reported analytical performance, multiplexing, matrix compatibility, perturbation risk, and clinical readiness. The reported performance spans single-copy imaging of splice variants in living cells to label-free detection at 580 fM in under 30 min without cDNA synthesis or PCR. Three conclusions follow. First, assay selection should be governed by the class of claim being made rather than by platform novelty. Second, analytical sensitivity measured on synthetic targets systematically overstates readiness in clinical matrices; therefore, matrix-matched validation is not optional. Third, cross-laboratory comparison is currently obstructed by inconsistent reporting, which we address by proposing a minimum performance-reporting set and explicit platform-selection criteria. We close with emerging directions, including CRISPR-based isoform detection, biosensor integration with nanopore sequencing, AI-assisted probe design, and digital and microfluidic formats.
More Related Videos
10:57Visualizing Genetic Variants, Short Targets, and Point Mutations in the Morphological Tissue Context with an RNA In Situ Hybridization Assay
Published on: August 14, 2018
09:58Using RNA-sequencing to Detect Novel Splice Variants Related to Drug Resistance in In Vitro Cancer Models
Published on: December 9, 2016
Related Concept Videos
RNA Splicing
RNA-seq
Before the discovery of RNA-seq, microarray-based methods and Sanger sequencing were used for transcriptome analysis. However, while microarray-based...
Alternative RNA Splicing
There are five types of alternative RNA splicing that vary in the ways the pre-mRNA segments are removed or retained in the mature mRNA. The first...