Athletic Performance Adaptations: Just Training Sprints or Combining Sprints With Three Different Strength Training Methods?
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 5, 2026

A Real-World High-Intensity Interval Training Protocol for Cardiorespiratory Fitness Improvement
Published on: February 22, 2022
Glenn Trane1, Stein Edgar Rodahl1, Olav Melhus Gomo1
1Department of Sport Science and Physical Education, Faculty of Education and Arts, Nord University, Bodø, Norway.
Abstract:
Trane, G, Rodahl, SE, Gomo, OM, Mehus, HA, Helgerud, J, and Unhjem, RJ. Athletic performance adaptations: Just training sprints or combining sprints with three different strength training methods? J Strength Cond Res XX(X): 000-000, 2026-In this exploratory study, we compared the effects of combining maximal strength training (MST), hypertrophy training (HT), or explosive strength training (EST) with sprint running vs. sprint running alone in control (CON). Fifty-eight recreationally active, nonstrength-trained men and women were randomized to 8 weeks, 3 sessions/week of MST (4 × 4 squats at ≥ 85% 1 repetition maximum [1RM]), HT (3 × 8-12 squats at ∼70-80% 1RM), EST (4 × 6-7 squat jumps at body weight), or CON (no strength training). All 4 groups performed 2 weekly 6 × 25-meter sprints. Maximal and explosive strength, sprint running performance, endurance performance determinants, and 30-second Wingate test cycling performance were evaluated. Leg press maximal voluntary isometric force (MVIF) improved more after MST (+14.5%) than after EST (+5.2%, p = 0.004) and CON (p ≤ 0.001), and more after HT (+10.6%) than CON (p = 0.008). The squat dynamic rate of force development improved more after MST (+37.4%) and HT (+36.0%) than CON (p = 0.014 and 0.002). Moreover, 0-25-meter sprint time improved more after MST (-0.11 s) and HT (-0.10 s) than CON (p = 0.019 and 0.042). Running economy improved more after MST (-2.5%) than CON (p = 0.026). Wingate test average power output improved more after MST (+6.6%) and HT (+6.9%) than EST (p = 0.020 and 0.010) and CON (p = 0.016 and 0.009). Peak power output improved more after MST (+11.8%) and HT (+10.1%) than CON (p = 0.011 and 0.040). ΔMVIF was associated with performance changes. Integrating sprint training with high-load strength training improved maximal and explosive strength and athletic performance more than sprint training alone, whereas this was not observed in EST. Performance improvements were attributed to enhanced maximal strength. Given the exploratory study design and the use of Fisher's least significant difference post hoc tests for between-group comparisons, these findings should be interpreted with caution and regarded as hypothesis-generating.
Related Concept Videos
Exercise and Muscle Performance
Endurance exercises
Endurance exercises involve running, swimming, or cycling, which require repetitive movements with low force output. When a person engages in endurance exercise, a few noticeable changes occur in their skeletal muscles. For instance, the number of capillaries...
Exercise and Cardiovascular Response
Light to moderate physical activity initiates a series of interconnected responses in the body. The heart rate modestly increases in anticipation of the workout, followed by widespread vasodilation as oxygen consumption by skeletal muscles increases. This results in decreased peripheral resistance, increased capillary blood flow, and accelerated...
Exercise and Cardiac Output
Sustained exercise increases the muscles' oxygen demand, which can be met...
Classification of Skeletal Muscle Fibers
Slow-Twitch Muscle Fibers
Slow oxidative, muscle fibers appear red due to large numbers of capillaries and high levels of...
Types of Skeletal Muscle Fibers
Fast-twitch fibers
Fast-twitch fibers, or Type II fibers, are designed for quick, powerful bursts of speed and strength. They reach peak tension within approximately 0.01 seconds following stimulation. Characterized by a large diameter and densely packed myofibrils, these fibers contain...
Muscle Recovery and Fatigue

