A Modified Approach in Robotic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 5, 2026

Robotics in Surgery: A Modular Robotic Platform Driven Gastric Wedge Resection
Published on: February 7, 2025
Wenwu Liu1, Zhenchong Chen1, Yukai Jin1
1State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center.
Abstract:
Robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer is safe and feasible, but the robotic system poses challenges in surgical field exposure and digestive tract reconstruction, often prolonging operative time. This protocol presents a Modified Approach in Robotic Gastrectomy (MARG) designed to standardize procedures, improve surgical quality, and reduce operative duration. The technique repositions trocars: Arm 1 (ultrasonic shear) is placed at the left lower quadrant, Arms 2 and 3 symmetrically at the upper abdomen, and the assistant port on the right side to prevent instrument collisions. A triangular surgical plane created by Arm 2, Arm 3, and the assistant enhances tissue exposure during lymphadenectomy while minimizing arm switching and camera repositioning. The right-sided assistant port facilitates totally stapled intracorporeal anastomosis without requiring a second assistant port or surgeon-assistant position changes. The protocol is demonstrated through distal gastrectomy with Billroth-II reconstruction and side-to-side jejunostomy. In this single-center, uncontrolled series of 25 consecutive patients who underwent this modified approach, 20 underwent distal gastrectomy with intracorporeal stapled anastomosis, and five underwent total or proximal gastrectomy; the median console time was 137.0 min (interquartile range [IQR] 115.3-166.3), and the median reconstruction time for the 20 distal-gastrectomy patients was 18.5 min (IQR 15.3-24.6). Mean blood loss was 70.4 mL (range 20-300), and no patient developed grade ≥III complications (Clavien-Dindo). Stapled anastomosis was associated with a shorter reconstruction time than the 40-60 min typically reported for robot-sewn anastomoses. Because the MARG modifications do not alter the standard extent of surgery, they are not expected to affect long-term oncologic outcomes; the present report, therefore, focuses on perioperative safety. Patients were followed up for 1 month postoperatively. This approach may enable surgeons to perform robotic gastrectomy more efficiently, with favorable perioperative outcomes in this preliminary series.