Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Complementarity vs. reduction as explanation of biological complexity.

H H Pattee

    The American Journal of Physiology
    |May 1, 1979
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Cell phenomenology: The first phenomenon.

    Progress in biophysics and molecular biology·2015
    Same author

    The origins of Michael Conrad's research programs (1964-1979).

    Bio Systems·2002
    Same author

    The physics of symbols: bridging the epistemic cut.

    Bio Systems·2001
    Same author

    The measurement problem in artificial world models.

    Bio Systems·1989
    Same author

    The complementarity principle and the origin of macromolecular information.

    Bio Systems·1979
    Same author

    Physical problems of decision-making constraints.

    The International journal of neuroscience·1972

    Biological structure and function are explained using epistemological complementarity, a concept requiring two distinct, incompatible descriptions. This framework helps simplify complex biological organization for better understanding and self-description.

    Area of Science:

    • Biophysics
    • Systems Biology
    • Philosophy of Science

    Background:

    • The classical structure-function relation in biology presents a challenge for unified scientific explanation.
    • Epistemological complementarity offers a framework to address this by requiring distinct descriptive modes.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To present the classical structure-function relation as an example of epistemological complementarity.
    • To explore the implications of complementarity for understanding biological organization.

    Main Methods:

    • Conceptual analysis of the structure-function relation.
    • Application of complementarity principles from physics to biological systems.
    • Identification of formal incompatibilities between descriptive modes.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Biological structure is described by causal physical laws, while function involves informational processes (measurement and control).
    • These two descriptive modes are formally incompatible, with laws being rate-dependent and functions rate-independent.
    • Complementarity provides a necessary framework for explaining and self-describing biological organization.

    Conclusions:

    • Epistemological complementarity is essential for a satisfactory explanation of biological structure and function.
    • The incompatibility between physical laws and informational processes highlights the unique nature of biological systems.
    • This approach simplifies complex biological organization, aiding explanation and self-description across all biological levels.