Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A cervical cytology campaign using a computerised age-sex register.

P N Dixon, A F Morris

    The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners
    |June 1, 1974
    PubMed
    Summary

    A cervical screening campaign achieved 80.7% response rate, with posters proving most effective publicity. Further analysis is needed to determine if the achieved coverage justifies the campaign costs.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Physiological Characteristics of Masters Female Distance Runners.

    The Physician and sportsmedicine·2016
    Same author

    Letters.

    The Physician and sportsmedicine·2016
    Same author

    Letters.

    The Physician and sportsmedicine·2016
    Same author

    sportsmedicine forum.

    The Physician and sportsmedicine·2016
    Same author

    Hemochromatosis exists in male military mid-career officers.

    Military medicine·1992
    Same author

    Identification of AIDS-related and other related attitudes.

    The Journal of social psychology·1992

    Area of Science:

    • Public Health
    • Preventive Medicine
    • Health Services Research

    Background:

    • Cervical cancer screening is crucial for early detection and prevention.
    • Effective invitation strategies and publicity are key to maximizing participation in screening programs.
    • Health centers play a vital role in delivering community-based screening initiatives.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the effectiveness and cost-efficiency of a targeted cervical screening campaign.
    • To assess response rates, attendance, and refusal rates for cervical smears.
    • To compare the impact of different publicity methods on screening uptake.

    Main Methods:

    • Utilized a computerized age-sex register to invite women aged 25-64 for cervical smears.
    • Implemented a three-month screening campaign with publicity measures including posters, newspaper ads, and handbills.
    • Calculated campaign costs per smear taken and analyzed response and attendance data.

    Main Results:

    • 80.7% of invited women responded to the invitation.
    • 11.5% of respondents refused the test, and 7.6% of acceptors failed to attend.
    • Posters were identified as the most effective publicity method; the campaign cost approximately £2.71 per smear.
    • Over 70% of the target population underwent screening during the campaign or preceding three years.

    Conclusions:

    • The cervical screening campaign demonstrated a high response rate and identified effective publicity channels.
    • While over 70% coverage was achieved, the cost-effectiveness remains undetermined due to data limitations.
    • Further research is recommended to validate the cost-benefit of such screening initiatives.

    Related Experiment Videos